Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-13 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Petr Pisar wrote: I don't think group responsibility works. The result is every group memeber says it does somebody else and then bugs will never get fixed. Group responsibility has been working fine for KDE SIG ever since its inception with the Core-Extras Merge in Fedora 7. No matter who the

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-13 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-12 Thread Michael Stahnke
I grabbed ruby-shadow, as it's needed for Puppet. I would love co-maintainers. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-12 Thread Casper
Peter Gordon a écrit : And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership of qrencode. =) Approved in devel, f16 and f15 branch Thank you for your involvement :) -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here:

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-12 Thread Michal Ingeli
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here:

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-12 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Ralf Corsepius [11/01/2012 09:59] : Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case. If perl-sig is the maintainer, only provenpackagers will be able to commit. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Paul Howarth
On 01/11/2012 02:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Šabata
Took the followin in Fedora (not EPEL) for now: perl-Algorithm-Annotate perl-Data-Hierarchy perl-File-chdir perl-Time-Progress perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree * rogue tinyfugue -P pgpOPEL64YCmK.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Tim Niemueller
I took clips and clipsmm, I was the only maintainer and I'm an active developer for clipsmm. Tim -- Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de www.niemueller.de = Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Casper
Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 pgpRbLYWonwUe.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I've taken over tetex-IEEEtrans and Jigdo. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread solarflow99
I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like to take that one if I can. 2012/1/11 Casper fan...@fedoraproject.org: Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. Took hfsplus-tools.

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:26:59AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those packages, which you gave me and orphan them? Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:44:16AM -0500, solarflow99 wrote: I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like to take that one if I can. You can sign up right here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/slim -Toshio pgpn8JWUP2rJh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Roland Grunberg
The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I'll be taking over eclipse-oprofile and eclipse-callgraph. -- Roland Grunberg -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed - php-ZendFramework

2012-01-11 Thread Remi Collet
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt php-ZendFramework have a co-maintainer (heller) I could ownership on it or co-ownership as heller want. Remi. --

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Jens Petersen
The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I took ownership of the haskell packages of bos: I had already been maintaining for a while anyway as comaintainer. And it makes more sense that one person owns all

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Peter Gordon
I've taken iec16022 for the Fedora 15/16/Devel branches. I would appreciate assistance in the EPEL branches though. (I've left those orphaned.) And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership of qrencode. =) I have done so because another of my packages, gLabels, requires

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-11 Thread Petr Pisar
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them

Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here:

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Rich Mattes
On 01/10/2012 09:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Robin 'cheese' Lee
I have taken: * ack * perl-Data-Types * perl-MongoDB * Zim robin On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.comwrote: On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had

Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

2012-01-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is