-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2014 08:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:55:02PM -0500, Jon wrote:
These packages could have dependencies on other packages
which are essential to that product's identity (like ye olde
dreaded
Hi
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really close to
the time when we _need_ it. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110764... as Dennis says,
we
have not yet decided how to differentiate the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:55:02PM -0500, Jon wrote:
I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
variant in either the VERSION field (VERSION=21 (Cloud)) or a new
os-release field which we
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:12:47AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
variant in either the VERSION
On 06/19/2014 02:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:55:02 -0500
Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I suggest that we have fedora-release-{workstation,server,cloud}
packages. I had originally suggested
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
NB: I have not read other replies to this thread yet.
On 06/18/2014 04:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really
close to the time when we _need_ it. See
On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really close to
the time when we_need_ it. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110764... as Dennis says, we
have not yet decided how to differentiate the different Fedora
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:06:38AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
This might have gotten a bad start because of the original naming
suggestion. Let me suggest a new one:
fedora-{workstation,server,cloud}
I do like fedora-$SOMETHING-{workstation,server,cloud -- makes it easer
to look for among
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:06:38AM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
This might have gotten a bad start because of the original naming
suggestion. Let me suggest a new one:
fedora-{workstation,server,cloud}
I do like
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really close to
the time when we _need_ it. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110764... as Dennis says, we
have not yet decided how to differentiate the different Fedora products.
I suggest that we have
On 06/18/2014 10:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
[snip]
I also suggest that /etc/os-release be switched using the alternatives
system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Alternatives), with the
variant in either the VERSION field (VERSION=21 (Cloud)) or a new
os-release field which we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:15:03 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really
close to the time when we _need_ it. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110764... as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:55:02 -0500
Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
We talked about this before, but I think now it's getting really
close to the time when we _need_
13 matches
Mail list logo
