On 08/26/2014 05:02 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
- Original Message -
I don't have any major objections to this, but I will note that
reports stopped being sent to FESCo because at some point they were
kind of redundant. Still working on thing X every week isn't really
something that
On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:46:40 +0200
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
I'm not against each group doing a summary, but as noted by Josh,
sometimes the summaries are very repetitive ( ...still working on
implemeting roles... etc)
List of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/2014 03:44 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:46:40 +0200 Honza Horak
hho...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
I'm not against each group doing a summary, but as noted by
Josh,
Hi working groups members,
since we have learned on Flock that new Fedora working groups do not
communicate with each other much (or enough), I'd like to propose the
following:
Every working group will time to time (e.g. weekly) send short summary
about what they did / were talking about
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi working groups members,
since we have learned on Flock that new Fedora working groups do not
communicate with each other much (or enough), I'd like to propose the
following:
Every working group will time to time (e.g.
- Original Message -
I don't have any major objections to this, but I will note that
reports stopped being sent to FESCo because at some point they were
kind of redundant. Still working on thing X every week isn't really
something that needs to be sent. So I would avoid a weekly
Isn't this what the meetingminutes mailing list is for? I'd argue that
a better solution is to have regular (not weekly) coordination
meetings where representatives of the WGs can talk about what's going
on and coordinate cross-WG issues.
--
Ben Cotton
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:46:40 +0200
Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
I'm not against each group doing a summary, but as noted by Josh,
sometimes the summaries are very repetitive ( ...still working on
implemeting roles... etc)
List of proposed MLs to send this summary to:
