Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:33:46 -0600, you wrote: Well, nobody can apply to the packager group; it is invite-only. There may be a few people in the sponsorship queue from before the invite-only functionality was implemented. Yes, when I logon on FAS I

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because I'm really not interessting which people are sponsors by other sponsors. Well, in the

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-06 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:36:06PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:31:59 +0100 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: No, I anyone pres the 'add to group' buttoun the mail will be sent to all sponsors. Such behaviour is called spaming, because I'm really not

Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-05 Thread Jochen Schmitt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, because I have read, that new contributors should not applies membership on the packagers group and the sponsor should invites them to this group, I have create the following proposal to improve the sponsorship process on Fedora:

Re: Proposal to improve the Sponsorship process on Fedora

2011-01-05 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
JS == Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de writes: JS because I have read, that new contributors should not applies JS membership on the packagers group and the sponsor should invites JS them to this group, Well, nobody can apply to the packager group; it is invite-only. There may be a few