On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:44:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Would it make sense for the obsolete list to be specified with versions?
> > yes, of course - it was just a sample.
> > google for package-swift and/or look at the fesco disc
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:44:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > Would it make sense for the obsolete list to be specified with versions?
> yes, of course - it was just a sample.
> google for package-swift and/or look at the fesco discussions from dec
> or january and you'll see that discussed, ad n
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
> > problem with it.
> > maybe even the package was named package-swift
> > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.or
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
> problem with it.
> maybe even the package was named package-swift
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec
Would it make sense for the obsolete lis
seth vidal writes:
> I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a
> problem with it.
>
> maybe even the package was named package-swift
>
> http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec
You can also use package-cleanup --orphans.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
> >
> > I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Rec
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
>
> I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
> python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to
python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from Fedora
some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately.
No
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> As opposed to leaving off a ; which NEVER happens.
I never happens.. if you always use left handed emoticons <-;
-jef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Here are the latest results of our python-2.7-rebuilds.
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/python27/python-27-rebuild-errors-20100731-1.html
Build failed in root.log: 25 packages
Build failed in build.log: 38 packages
Build succeeded, but may depend on old python (please check): 45 packages
---
Total :
On Friday 30 July 2010 20:21:20 seth vidal wrote:
> As opposed to leaving off
a ; which NEVER happens.
Or adding an extra one:
while
(some_condition);
{
do_something;
}
;-)
> -sv
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
David Malcolm wrote:
> - configure.ac files that list python 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 but not 2.7
By the way, CMake also had this bug. I fixed cmake (in dist-f14) a while
ago, so stuff using CMake should now work, unless they use their own .cmake
files with the same bug to locate Python (in which cas
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:18 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > Looking at the script [3], it looks like the indentation of the call to
> > kojisession.tagBuildBypass(target, build) is wrong; it should be guarded
> > by the "if not newer" conditional. Patch attached.
>
> Yuck! T
David Malcolm wrote:
> Looking at the script [3], it looks like the indentation of the call to
> kojisession.tagBuildBypass(target, build) is wrong; it should be guarded
> by the "if not newer" conditional. Patch attached.
Yuck! The joys of an indentation-sensitive language… :-(
Kevin Ko
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> Still, if they were in the py27 tag they *must* need to be rebuilt again
> anyway, because the later builds in Rawhide would have been against
> Python 2.6 and hence would be broken anyway. So in practice it doesn't
> make a huge different, AFAICT.
Bo
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
> > A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
> > rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
> > anaconda (see [1] again).
>
> Oof. In the fut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2010 09:25 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Looks like a bug in the script that I used; it was meant to not move
> them, but in fact it did.
D'oh. Due to an earlier bug in this script (which David successfully
fixed) I didn't notice this later bug
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 11:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
> > A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
> > rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
> > anaconda (see [1] again).
>
> Oof. In the fut
David Malcolm (dmalc...@redhat.com) said:
> A further 26 builds in dist-f14-py27-rebuild had newer builds in
> rawhide, so we'll need to rebuild these; some are important e.g. yum and
> anaconda (see [1] again).
Oof. In the future, can we make sure we just don't move these builds
that override ne
Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
Many thanks to everyone who helped get us this far!
Jesse and I moved 931 builds [1] from dist-f14-py27-rebuild to dist-f14
about 45 minutes ago. If I'm reading the Koji logs correct [2] [3],
these packages are now available in the buildroot for F14, so furt
21 matches
Mail list logo
