On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Petr Vobornik pvobo...@redhat.com wrote:
This solution is much nicer and can be used by other font packages as well.
Here's the new package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036754
Very awesome, thanks! I'll sponsor you and review. :-)
Luckily, I
On 11/30/2013 09:04 PM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
Petr Vobornik wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Just write a fontforge or ttx script that flips this bit at rpm build
time, assuming you've done your legal review correctly the bit is in
contradiction with the font license (if the font was no
Petr Vobornik wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Just write a fontforge or ttx script that flips this bit at rpm build
time, assuming you've done your legal review correctly the bit is in
contradiction with the font license (if the font was no installable we
could not package it in the first
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit :
OTF/TTF fails in all modern versions of IE when the font does not have
embedding permissions set to 'installable' [1]. It's more common that
one would say.
Of course it is very common, it's the default setting
On 11/28/2013 02:25 PM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit :
OTF/TTF fails in all modern versions of IE when the font does not have
embedding permissions set to 'installable' [1]. It's more common that
one would say.
Of
Hi,
I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since
its conclusion(below) is not very usable.
The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open
Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being packaged and I planned to
package Open Sans (Apache license
Le Mer 27 novembre 2013 15:39, Petr Vobornik a écrit :
Hi,
I would like to reopen the discussion about packaging web fonts since
its conclusion(below) is not very usable.
The issue I'm dealing with is that we want FreeIPA Web UI to use Open
Sans and Font Awesome(FA) font. FA is being
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 12:30, Alec Leamas a écrit :
On 05/05/2013 11:40 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Are you sure it works well in IE8 at all? Because there are lots of
other
reasons a modern web site will fail in old ie versions
Double checking... and you're right, openerp only supports IE 9+.
On 05/03/2013 09:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :
Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
possible set of browsers (including IE): should we really just drop the
formats required by IE? From a user perspective, I
On 2013-05-05 10:19 (GMT+0200) Alec Leamas composed:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Here is the current status of @font-face ttf/otf support in browsers:
http://caniuse.com/ttf ...
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 10:19, Alec Leamas a écrit :
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be a widely used IE version
today, is this really the way to go?
It seems to be a case of Fedora being first and Microsoft being
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 06:40, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
I think spot will agree there is no way we'll ever ship a font
consisting
of company logos, it's trademark hell
We ship *lots* of trademarked logos. In
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 11:27, Felix Miata a écrit :
On 2013-05-05 10:19 (GMT+0200) Alec Leamas composed:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Here is the current status of @font-face ttf/otf support in browsers:
http://caniuse.com/ttf ...
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE
On 2013-05-05 11:44 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side.
For what definition of out-of-support?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/endofsupport.aspx
Considering Fedora release lifetimes, WinXP seems to have abundant life left.
--
The wise are known
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 12:01, Felix Miata a écrit :
On 2013-05-05 11:44 (GMT+0200) Nicolas Mailhot composed:
XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side.
For what definition of out-of-support?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/endofsupport.aspx
Considering Fedora release lifetimes, WinXP seems
On 05/05/2013 11:40 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Dim 5 mai 2013 10:19, Alec Leamas a écrit :
This seems to mean that we force web applications to exclude IE version
8 (and older) clients. As this seems to be a widely used IE version
today, is this really the way to go?
It seems to be a case
Am 05.05.2013 11:44, schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
And XP is out-of-support Microsoft-side. So any company use (that is what
is being talked about here) is likely to stop soonish
fix your calendar
there where i live we have 2013 and not 2014
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/03/2013 09:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
[cut]
I'm truly a font newbie. That said, is there really a meaningful
fallback for a font such as sozial
(https://github.com/adamstac/zocial)? I. e., is there a reasonable
fallback for a Facebook button?
I think spot will agree there is no way
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
I think spot will agree there is no way we'll ever ship a font consisting
of company logos, it's trademark hell
We ship *lots* of trademarked logos. In Firefox alone there are
trademarked logos from Mozilla,
On 04/29/2013 11:22 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? scratching my head.
Me too :)
Note that in my case the fonts are just just images
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? scratching my head.
That means that you usually do not need a special format
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 14:45, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
Note that in my case the fonts are just just images and icons, which
makes the normal font fallback mechanisms useless. They are needed,
period.
Well it is not defined in policy.
Actually, the current policy forbids fonts anywhere but in
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
NM permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
But selinux probably doesn't, so the issue is slightly more complicated.
- J
--
devel mailing
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 16:24, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I'm not convinced at all this needs changing, since mod_alias
NM permits mapping of system paths anywhere you want in your URL space.
But selinux probably doesn't, so the
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
NM /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
NM /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much the same namespace.
Well, there are a whole lot of specific fcontext
On 05/03/2013 03:51 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 29 avril 2013 11:22, Alec Leamas a écrit :
The reply makes me feel a little more confused, on a higher level. How
does that reply translate to the packaging of a web application with
some bundled webfonts ? scratching my head.
That means
Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :
Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
possible set of browsers (including IE): should we really just drop the
formats required by IE? From a user perspective, I don't really follow
this although I do understand
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
NM == Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net writes:
NM I don't think selinux will block web server accesses to
NM /usr/share/fonts/something, since we deploy webapps in
NM /usr/share/something_else, which is pretty much
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying to package the webfonts as dependencies I have
On 04/29/2013 11:04 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 04/27/2013 01:49 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying
Hi!
I'm trying to package a web application with bundled fonts. These fonts
are used by the web clients (browsers), and just served from the Fedora
webapp. The case is similar to javascript .js files.
Trying to package the webfonts as dependencies I have run into problem
together with my
31 matches
Mail list logo
