On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:10:39 -0800
Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net
wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that
query in my
On 05/11/2010 10:03 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:47 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The
Till Maas wrote:
A current problem I see with using upstream release monitoring is that
there is no easy way to query which bugs are ignored, because it is
perfectly valid to not touch the bug as a maintainer but only update the
package. This will avoid a new bug to be filed, but the
On 15 May 2010 22:13, Till Maas wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:29:37PM +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
On 15 May 2010 21:07, Till Maas wrote:
The upstream release monitoring tool (formerly fever) is not really used
to identify such packages, because there is no process to identify
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 18:51:08 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 05:47:48PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3
On 05/11/2010 07:30 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
This probably means at least a rudimentary application testing rig
and a discipline that identifies and deals with distressed packages.
Does the ongoing work with
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based
On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
And meanwhile leave the unaddressed security issues and prominent bugs
open for more days?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 03:29:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:26 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Xavier responsed to rubygem-json related bug recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589801
So I guess trying to re-contact him is better.
And meanwhile leave
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not be responsive enough wrt the severity of
the security problem ? We
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mamoru Tasaka
mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3 based games such as
OpenArena. The maintainer has not responded
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not be responsive
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:30:41AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On 05/11/2010 04:07 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security
issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Quake3
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:38:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
CVE should the maintainer not
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you would appreciate co-maintainers?
For example, soundconverter has 8 open tickets,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:10:42 +0200, Xavier wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
I definitively missed that one.
Like to comment on your other packages? Are there any packages where
you
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are
filed against any package, and who have
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
Sure would be good to have
On 05/11/2010 12:05 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 12:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
Sure would be good to have volunteers for
On 05/11/2010 01:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said:
This seems like rather a major shortcoming in our processes. A security
team whom can merely file bugs has no power to ensure security flaws
are fixed in a timely manner is not good for Fedora.
On 05/12/2010 12:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and peek at it every couple days.
You might want to get in touch with the security team. I
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and peek at it every couple days.
Indeed. I'd like to use my proven
On 05/11/2010 02:10 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Cieslal...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and peek at it every
Am Dienstag, den 11.05.2010, 17:47 +0800 schrieb Chen Lei:
2010/5/11 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com
Hi
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3
Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has
security
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems a lot of trivial packages in fedora are unmaintained for a long
I dispute your claim that there are a lot.
Yes we are going to have things fall through the cracks. But I've seen
no analysis and no tools which would
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 01:26:53PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
How often does the AWOL maintainer process get used? Very rarely. If
there were a lot of unmaintained packages I would expect to see the
AWOL process be firing all the time as people reacted to missing
maintainers.
I use the
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:10:39AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Well, no, not if there's an easy way to find the existing stuff. Is
there a way to extract this info from Bugzilla? I'd stick that query in
my bookmarks and
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
I use the non-responsive process or active nagging quite a lot, since I
often stumble upon such packages (it already happend twice to youtube-dl
that the current maintainer did not have enough time). Thankfully the
start of
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
This probably means at least a rudimentary application testing rig
and a discipline that identifies and deals with distressed packages.
Does the ongoing work with AutoQA provide the solution you are looking
35 matches
Mail list logo
