Peter Robinson wrote:
> We already have a process for that. They reach out to the maintainer
> to be a co-maintainer at which point they can request the branches and
> do the builds.
The process we already have is actually:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:04 PM Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
>> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
>> branches.
>>
>> However, it
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr>
>wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler
>
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at>
> wrote:
> >
> > Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > * Should any other packager (not that
On 03. 12. 19 10:41, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
As for the issue discussed in this thread, this sounds like a fairly easy change
to add to: https://pagure.io/fedscm-admin/.
Could someone open a ticket there? (Do not allow non-maintainer to request a
branch on a package)
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
>
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request
> > new branches on that repo?
> >
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request
> > new branches on that repo?
> > * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request?
>
> Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request
> new branches on that repo?
> * Should provenpackager be able to do the same request?
Since I do not give a darn about what happens to my packages on EPEL, I am
fine with anybody requesting EPEL branches
On 02/12/2019 14:37, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IIUC, effectively "new branches" means "EPEL branches" since normal
> Fedora branches are all created automatically.
>
> So to rephrase this
>
> * Should someone who is not the maintainer be able to declare
> that the maintainer must
On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd like to ask
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 01:55:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
> branches.
>
> However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
>
> I'd
On 02. 12. 19 13:55, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Hello,
3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
branches.
However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
I'd like to ask people on this mailing list
Hello,
3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether
non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request
branches.
However, it never went anywhere outside of that ticket.
I'd like to ask people on this mailing list a few questions. Let's say
we have some
13 matches
Mail list logo
