Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to go:
>
> 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
> are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
> together onto the target system)
+1 to this option
-- R
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 22:53 -0500, Jon wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
> sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
...
> > From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to
> > go:
> >
> > 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends:
> > pac
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:05:24 PM
> Subject: RPM Weak Dependencies and the install media compose process
>
> (Please keep the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> (Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
> -eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
>
Nod, thanks for that!
>
> This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the us
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
> From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to go:
>
> 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
> are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
> together onto the targ
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:05:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
>> are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
>> together onto the target syste
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:05:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
> are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
> together onto the target system)
Can this have the inverse of the case in #3 (where Recomm
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 13:06 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 10, 2015 08:05:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > (Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the
> > rel
> > -eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial
> > message)
> >
> > This past
On Friday, July 10, 2015 08:05:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
> -eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
>
> This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
> "weak dependencie
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 07:56 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > You didn't offer your opinion on which of the three options you
> > think
> > we should go with. I would offer option 1 is the one we'd pick.
> > It
> > honors the intentions o
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher <
> sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > (Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the
> > rel
> > -eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial
> > message)
>
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> You didn't offer your opinion on which of the three options you think
> we should go with. I would offer option 1 is the one we'd pick. It
> honors the intentions of the package maintainer the best. Which
> would
> you choose?
Option 2 is
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
> -eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
>
> This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
> "weak dependencies" i
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
"weak dependencies" in Fedora. What this means is that RPM packages can
now have three le
14 matches
Mail list logo
