Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-19 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> Could this ugly hack work? > > %{endif __with_rebar3} > > Assuming the %endif macro would ignore any parameters. This won't work... But RPM could "learn" this syntax and let spec writers add that kind of comment inside the macro. A bit far-fetched, I won t disagree :) Dridi

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

2019-06-19 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/19/19 6:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working for years. rpmbuild doesn't like them anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or were) in the file

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

2019-06-18 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 01:18, Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: > > OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced them > with commands. > > I expect that many package maintainers will be hit with this. There are in fact only 10 packages using these macros: $ rg

Re: octave 5.1 coming to rawhide

2019-06-18 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 6/18/19 9:17 PM, Thomas Sailer wrote: On 18.06.19 05:31, Orion Poplawski wrote: Deps with issues: octave-communications - Need new release for 5.1 support - https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?56514 I have built octave-communications with the patch attached to bug 56514. Thanks. I

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

2019-06-18 Thread Philip Kovacs via devel
OK, my builds are back in order having removed those macros and replaced them with commands. I expect that many package maintainers will be hit with this. On Wednesday, June 19, 2019, 12:01:31 AM EDT, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: >

Re: rawhide no longer recognizing autotool macros

2019-06-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:48 PM Philip Kovacs via devel wrote: > > I'm getting new build failures on the autotools macros that had been working > for years. rpmbuild doesn't like > them anymore in rawhide. The macros are (or were) in the file > `/usr/lib/rpm/macros`. The relevant portion >

Re: octave 5.1 coming to rawhide

2019-06-18 Thread Thomas Sailer
On 18.06.19 05:31, Orion Poplawski wrote: Deps with issues: octave-communications - Need new release for 5.1 support - https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?56514 I have built octave-communications with the patch attached to bug 56514. ___ devel

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I again completely disagree. There is no reason for weeks of breakage. > Most of the issues that break composes are unannounced abi bumps where > just rebuilding dependent packages fixes it. Or broken deps (likewise). > Or mistakes made in kickstarts/comps. Or something that

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-18 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, I'll also take python-email_reply_parser. It's actively developed by upstream. Regards, Raphael Am 17.06.19 um 21:14 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-18 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi Miro, I can take csvdiff. It has official support for Python 3.7: https://github.com/larsyencken/csvdiff/blob/163dd9da676a8e5f926a935803726340261f03ae/setup.py#L55 Regards, Raphael Am 17.06.19 um 21:14 schrieb Miro Hrončok: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> > Not sure if I understand. Are you saying that > > > >%endif%{discard:__with_rebar3} > > > > will not work either? > > Yes, that's what I'm saying. Or rather, you'd get the warning with that > too. It all *behaves* exactly the same as before, so it continues to "work". Could this ugly

Re: Intent to orphan: php-maennchen-zipstream-php

2019-06-18 Thread Randy Barlow
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 12:23 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > I intend to orphan php-maennchen-zipstream-php. This package is now orphaned. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:54 AM Viktor Ashirov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin > wrote: > > > > Hi team, > > I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the > customer's ENV. > > It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task. > > I use it for building

Re: LaTeX: Font lmroman10-regular: at 10pt not loadable: metric data not found or bad

2019-06-18 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > texlive-lm noarch 8:svn48145-25.fc30 build 13 M I thought this sounded like a familiar problem. Indeed, I already filed a bug about it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715698 -- Jerry James

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Sorry, missed part of the sentence. > There are several ways how one can implement it. I would personally > prefer pull requests to dist-git over scratch builds. I think it is > important to keep some visibility in the system, so that not just the > owner of a change, but also random lurkers can

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler

Re: encrypted swap with urandom key problem

2019-06-18 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:58 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Sa, 08.06.19 15:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > > > However, in the failing case, that doesn't happen, and systemd hangs > > indefinitely waiting for it to appear. And in the early debug shell, > > 'blkid' sees

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 11:42 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > * Koji -- yes > * Mock -- yes Since https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Release-Notes-1.4.15 but it has to be enabled manually in config. Since version 1.4.17 (yet to be released) it will be enabled by default, and you will

Re: LaTeX: Font lmroman10-regular: at 10pt not loadable: metric data not found or bad

2019-06-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 06. 19 1:43, Jerry James wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: Hey, we have a weird failure with python-sphinx tests described here: Is texlive-lm installed in the build root? yes: texlive-lm noarch 8:svn48145-25.fc30 build 13 M

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
> python-num2words orphan 0 weeks ago I have requested ownership of this for the neuro-sig. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8450 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone:

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Howard Chu
> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:54:43 +0200 > From: Viktor Ashirov > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin wrote: >> >> Hi team, >> I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the >> customer's ENV. >> It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task. >> I use it for

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/18/19 3:56 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: So if you have %if 1 == 1 echo moo %else # %define aaa bbb echo foo %endif # %define aaa ccc ...the value of aaa macro is actually bbb after parsing this. Those %define's could also be there without the comment marks and behave the

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Panu Matilainen: > So if you have > > %if 1 == 1 > echo moo > %else # %define aaa bbb > echo foo > %endif # %define aaa ccc > > ...the value of aaa macro is actually bbb after parsing this. Those > %define's could also be there without the comment marks and behave the > same deed. > > So the

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread William Brown
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:48, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:45 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:38, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:45 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:38, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread William Brown
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:38, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > Memalign is pretty important -

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:33 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > > > > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove > it". > > > I didn't say

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread William Brown
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 14:19, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove it". > > I didn't say "remove", I said "review". > > > > There are some structures in the code

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 2:10 PM William Brown wrote: > > > > > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove > it". > > I didn't say "remove", I said "review". > > > > There are some structures in the code that rely on this for performance > to guarantee that they memory

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread William Brown
> > Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove it". > I didn't say "remove", I said "review". > > There are some structures in the code that rely on this for performance to > guarantee that they memory is aligned to a page boundary, or cache line > boundary. In

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 9:50 AM William Brown wrote: > > > > On 18 Jun 2019, at 07:54, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin > wrote: > >> > >> Hi team, > >> I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the > customer's ENV. > >> It is

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/18/19 2:09 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) %endif

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >> I disagree. I think we need

Re: ltspfs: long standing FTBFS

2019-06-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 06. 19 0:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear ltspfs maintainers, please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332 Hey Miro, According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ltspfs, this package has been retired a week

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Panu Matilainen: > On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Panu Matilainen: >> >>> On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: > On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) >> >> %endif %{__with_rebar3}

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/18/19 10:15 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) %endif %{__with_rebar3} I would rewrite it to: %endif # __with_rebar3 Actually

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:21 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Hi, > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >> I disagree. I think we need

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le 2019-06-17 22:04, Terry Bowling a écrit : Hi If I may, since I also represented the customer side not so long ago in a fortunexxx company. * Customers think we had too many repos. It is hard to find what they need. From a customer point of view you sidestepped the demand.

Re: Automating R package dependencies

2019-06-18 Thread Florian Festi
It would be really great to have a proper upstream repository for these scripts so they don't just live inside of distgit. They could have their own repository in https://github.com/rpm-software-management or could be placed in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm-extras. What ever you

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps

2019-06-18 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hi! Would anyone like to swap reviews? I've got python-pylatex ready for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721409 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Igor Gnatenko
* Koji -- yes * Mock -- yes * COPR -- no idea Koji and Mock are definitely only if you use rawhide chroot. On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and > >

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
, not the Fedora one). That means Go 1.14 at the earliest, end of the year. The module support in Go 1.13, scheduled for this summer, is not complete enough to be used in rpm packages. @eclipseo: that means you can re-add automated BuildRequires to our Go packaging guidelibnes, it was removed

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le 2019-06-18 10:42, Miro Hrončok a écrit : On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi folks, as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide. All of the following works? Koji, mock and copr? Mock already worked IIRC. Regards.

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le 2019-06-18 03:27, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : Hi folks, Hi as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide. Change Page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires Example of real build:

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 18. 06. 19 3:27, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hi folks, as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide. All of the following works? Koji, mock and copr? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:05 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks > > >> things from landing as we can

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-18 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 3:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Hi folks, > > as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and > DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide. > > Change Page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires > Example of real build: >

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-18 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:59 PM Terry Bowling wrote: > > Oh, I forgot to add that related to parallel installations, when conflicting > modules are desired, generally containerization or virtualization is the > recommended solution. However, this is from the RHEL user persona > perspective.

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-18 Thread William Brown
> On 18 Jun 2019, at 07:54, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin wrote: >> >> Hi team, >> I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the >> customer's ENV. >> It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task. >> I use it for building and

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-18 Thread Fran Tsao Santín
El lun., 17 jun. 2019 a las 21:15, Miro Hrončok () escribió: > gpart dcantrel, orphan 6 weeks ago I'll take gpart, is a lifesaver :-) https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8447 -- Francisco J. Tsao Santín https://gattaca.es Twitter: @FranTsao 1024D/71CF4D62

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Florian Weimer
* Panu Matilainen: > On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Panu Matilainen: >> >>> On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) %endif %{__with_rebar3} I would rewrite it to: %endif # __with_rebar3 >>> >>> Actually

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-18 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/17/19 4:45 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Panu Matilainen: On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) %endif %{__with_rebar3} I would rewrite it to: %endif # __with_rebar3 Actually both are wrong, and rpm >= 4.15 will complain (unlike old

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-18 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 18. 06. 19 v 2:03 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks >>> things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping >>> composes going is much easier on all of

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-18 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 17. 06. 19 v 21:14 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: >

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-17 Thread Viktor Ashirov
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:30 AM Simon Pichugin wrote: > > Hi team, > I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the > customer's ENV. > It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task. > I use it for building and testing my code. And it is pretty important to > build with

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Xfce 4.14

2019-06-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 6/17/19 5:08 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/xfce-4.14 == Summary == Xfce desktop environment has version 4.13.x which is currently available in Fedora. Significant work has been completed to migrate the DE to GTK-3 completely. The obvious benefit to this

Re: octave 5.1 coming to rawhide

2019-06-17 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 6/16/19 4:40 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm about about to start building octave 5.1 and dependent packages in rawhide.  This is a soname and octave api change. Built in rawhide. Modular updates submitted for F30 and F29.

Re: HEADS UP: DynamicBuildRequires are available

2019-06-17 Thread James Cassell
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 9:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi folks, > > as of today, builders have been updated (thanks to Kevin) and > DynamicBuildRequires finally work in Rawhide. > > Change Page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires > Example of real build: >

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-17 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:01 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks > >> things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping > >> composes going is much

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:53 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks > >> things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping > >> composes going is much

[389-devel] Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

2019-06-17 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 6/17/19 7:30 PM, Simon Pichugin wrote: Hi team, I'm in the process of creating a Vagrant file which is close to the customer's ENV. It is heavilly based on Viktor's beaker task. I use it for building and testing my code. And it is pretty important to build with ASAN. Currently, what I do

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 6/17/19 4:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks >> things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping >> composes going is much easier on all of us. Then things can be fixed >> when gating catches

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I disagree. I think we need gating to block as much stuff that breaks > things from landing as we can and then we should find that keeping > composes going is much easier on all of us. Then things can be fixed > when gating catches them and it's on the person who broke things.

Re: LaTeX: Font lmroman10-regular: at 10pt not loadable: metric data not found or bad

2019-06-17 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hey, we have a weird failure with python-sphinx tests described here: Is texlive-lm installed in the build root? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list --

Re: ltspfs: long standing FTBFS

2019-06-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear ltspfs maintainers, > please fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675332 Hey Miro, According to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ltspfs, this package has been retired a week ago, after having been orphaned for more than

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 21:27, Luis Enrique Bazán De León wrote: Hi Miro Can I work on this python-slugify Sure, request package ownership via: https://pagure.io/releng/issues -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 2:51 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > RPM-OSTree is functionally irrelevant in this discussion, Changing how we handle the kernel is certainly relevant. > since it has > its own behavior patterns and eschews compatibility with the greater > ecosystem anyway. I don't think

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bodhi 4 in EPEL 7

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 6/13/19 3:03 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > * Bodhi 4 is Python 3 only. Bodhi 2 is Python 2 only. So, upgrading to > Bodhi 4 isn't just a switch to a newer Bodhi, it will also mean a > switch in Python versions. This will affect dependencies (there are a > few). > * I think we might be

Re: RFC: Multiple parallel side tags

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 6/10/19 3:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Kolman wrote: >> But even for package development and integration you need something that >> works at least a bit. If you won't get a compose for a few weeks due to >> the constant breakage you won't get much work done on landing your latest >>

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Terry Bowling
Oh, I forgot to add that related to parallel installations, when conflicting modules are desired, generally containerization or virtualization is the recommended solution. However, this is from the RHEL user persona perspective. We realize that is a very different user persona from say a

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 22:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: - right after the F32 branching (2019-08-13 according to the [schedule]), we would start with the side tag builds This is probably a typo, you must mean "just after the F31 branching", right? Yes! F31 branching. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone:

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > When I filed the Python 3.8 [change] for Fedora 31, we knew that the schedule > would be tight. > > For that very reason, we have not yet started to build for Python 3.8 in a f31 > side tag, but instead we've only been doing it in

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Terry Bowling
Regarding to a few of the questions about why modularity was created in the first place (paraphrased), I can offer the following background. Note, I was not on the team at the very beginning but have been very involved for the last ~2 years. Do not consider the following to be formal answers,

Re: F30 FTBFS Packages - Help Please?

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 6/1/19 6:40 PM, Scott Talbert wrote: > Hi, > ...snip... I went and did these two: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/syslinux/pull-request/1 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/linux-atm/pull-request/1 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Trouble logging into pagure.io

2019-06-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 5/27/19 6:55 AM, Arjun Shankar wrote: > Hi, > > My FAS account is "submachine". I just tried logging into pagure.io, and > while the login succeeded, immediately after, I got a 404 error page with > the error 'No user "submachine" found'. All pagure.io URLs lead to the same > 404, so I can't

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 21:41, Ben Cotton wrote: Thanks for bringing this up, Miro. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: - there are ~200 build failures that block this, tracked on [bugzilla] I did a spot check of a few of the BZs and it looks like some of those build failures are

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Ben Cotton
Thanks for bringing this up, Miro. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > - there are ~200 build failures that block this, tracked on [bugzilla] I did a spot check of a few of the BZs and it looks like some of those build failures are unrelated to Python 3.8 but are due to

Re: Orphaned packages, who will take them?

2019-06-17 Thread Luis Enrique Bazán De León
Hi Miro Can I work on this python-slugify FAS lbazan Cheers, El lun., 17 jun. 2019 a las 14:14, Miro Hrončok () escribió: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package

Re: Langpacks and the packages needed to display/input a language

2019-06-17 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JP" == Jens-Ulrik Petersen writes: JP> Jason, can you explain in more details (bug report is also fine) how JP> exactly you are installing? I install a generic minimal system via kickstart (booted using the Server PXE images and using the Everything repositories) and then after the

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 2:29 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > > extended to support this. > > > >

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 6/14/19 6:29 AM, Daniel Mach wrote: Dne 14. 06. 19 v 6:23 Samuel Sieb napsal(a): After reading the bug report and the discussions, I still don't understand why dnf is complaining about a conflict with packages (modules?) that are not installed and are not even trying to be installed.  Can

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > extended to support this. > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 2:53 AM Remi Collet wrote: > > Le 14/06/2019 à 20:03, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:50 AM Remi Collet > > wrote: > >> > >> > >>> IMHO, having library in modules is an error, this can only raise issues > >> > >> Some examples, taken from RHEL-8 > >> >

Re: Is __python now required to be defined in rawhide?

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 16:28, Florian Weimer wrote: * Florian Weimer: diff --git a/macros.python-srpm b/macros.python-srpm index 514a449..f25189b 100644 --- a/macros.python-srpm +++ b/macros.python-srpm @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ %__python2 /usr/bin/python2 %__python3 /usr/bin/python3 +# This now errors

Re: Is __python now required to be defined in rawhide?

2019-06-17 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: >> diff --git a/macros.python-srpm b/macros.python-srpm >> index 514a449..f25189b 100644 >> --- a/macros.python-srpm >> +++ b/macros.python-srpm >> @@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ >> %__python2 /usr/bin/python2 >> %__python3 /usr/bin/python3 >> >> +# This now errors unless redefined to

Re: Any new restriction in Koji added recently in Rawhide?

2019-06-17 Thread Florian Weimer
* Panu Matilainen: > On 6/13/19 12:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> This is wrong (not sure if the culprit) >> >> %endif %{__with_rebar3} >> >> I would rewrite it to: >> >> %endif # __with_rebar3 > > Actually both are wrong, and rpm >= 4.15 will complain (unlike old > versions). Rpm only supports

Re: Automating R package dependencies

2019-06-17 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Sunday, 16 June 2019 03.09.41 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > Hi R-interested packagers and others, > > So now the question is how to apply this. I expect there are social > concerns, i.e., discussing with the R maintainer, making a > Self-contained Change, etc. But for this email, I am

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:35 AM Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > extended to support this. > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel

Re: encrypted swap with urandom key problem

2019-06-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sa, 08.06.19 15:34, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > However, in the failing case, that doesn't happen, and systemd hangs > indefinitely waiting for it to appear. And in the early debug shell, > 'blkid' sees it. That means the kernel and libblkid see it. I've got > no idea why

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:35 AM Michael Schroeder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > extended to support this. > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Michael Schroeder
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > extended to support this. I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel and instead add the version to the kernel package name. Cheers,

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 06. 19 6:27, Carl George wrote: I think the best option is to create non-modular compat packages. In my opinion, modularity makes sense for end user applications, but I'm not sure what benefits it has for libraries. Libraries tend to work well as compat packages, so I implemented

Re: Orphaning all my packages

2019-06-16 Thread Raphael Groner
Hi, I'd like to see dvdbackup surviving in Fedora. Although, a DVD clearly isn't the medium to prefer any more in the current century. Maybe I manage to take ownership. In the hope it's not too late or we need a re-review. The package was retired 13 days ago. Co-maintainers are of course

Re: Automating R package dependencies

2019-06-16 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 22:52, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > >> > 6. R only has two levels of dependencies (hard-require or suggested, >> > but not installed by default). Thus both build- and runtime-optional >> > packages are in Suggests; do we care about the extra Suggests? >> >> Sometimes

Re: Automating R package dependencies

2019-06-16 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019, 10:00 AM Iñaki Ucar, wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 05:07, Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > > > Hi R-interested packagers and others, > > > > Recently, I've been looking at how RPM can automatically determine > > Provides and Requires [1]. I have since implemented

[EPEL-devel] Re: Bodhi 4 in EPEL 7

2019-06-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 18:52, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > Fedora Infrastructure recently deployed Bodhi 4.0.0 to production, > which included quite a few backwards incompatible changes[0]. Some of > the changes have resulted in older Bodhi clients (less than 4.0.0) not > being

Re: Langpacks and the packages needed to display/input a language

2019-06-16 Thread Jens-Ulrik Petersen
Jason, can you explain in more details (bug report is also fine) how exactly you are installing? (Because for both Workstation/Silverblue, and Server I believe, we install fonts and input methods for Korean (and other langs like Japanese) by default anyway - so actually no need to install

Re: Automating R package dependencies

2019-06-16 Thread Iñaki Ucar
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 05:07, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Hi R-interested packagers and others, > > Recently, I've been looking at how RPM can automatically determine > Provides and Requires [1]. I have since implemented this for R using > an R script [2] and some file attributes [3].

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 7:15 AM Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Adam Samalik wrote: > > So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With > > a help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on common > > ground:

Re: Modularity vs. libgit

2019-06-16 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Samalik wrote: > So, I'd like to discuss the libgit issue [1] [2] we're experiencing. With > a help of a few people, I've put together this post to get us on common > ground: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/modularity-vs-libgit/ > > There are few ideas about solving the issue right

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >