Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-11-09 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Based on this thread, I will retire now this package. ​That's should be save to do IMHO: * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hylafax+/c/4886f02ec6327a54488750acf4b9e05559a48460?branch=master ​ *

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-11-06 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Based on this thread, I will retire now this package. -- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-12 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]" > If you wish, we could create a BlueJeans meeting > (open for everyone) to go through these guidelines and fix them together. > ;) I unfortunately don't have right to edit the wiki, nor I want to mess > with something which you

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-12 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
Sorry for the delay in reply, vacation... Anyway, back to work! :) On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:25 PM, wrote: > > > - Mail original - > De: "David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]" > > > * Regarding the font family names and subpackages -- it's another mess. > > Not just in

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:17 AM, David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > So, I have tried to rebuild 'hylafax+' with 'urw-base35-fonts' and it > passed: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22352204 > > I suggest we rebase it newer version (5.5 -> 6.0.6 -- the latest

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-09 Thread nicolas . mailhot
- Mail original - De: "David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]" > * Regarding the font family names and subpackages -- it's another mess. > Not just in Fedora (the FPG for fonts are really outdated), but generally > everywhere. Since I wrote those, I'd like to qualify this: 1. Fedora basic packaging

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-09 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
So, I have tried to rebuild 'hylafax+' with 'urw-base35-fonts' and it passed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22352204 I suggest we rebase it newer version (5.5 -> 6.0.6 -- the latest stable release is already 5 years old -- http://www.hylafax.org/content/Download), rebuild it

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-09 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > I don't see a urw-base35-fonts SRPM in my RawHide ... has it > been packaged? > ​Yes, it's in the Rawhide already: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/urw-base35-fonts​ My mirror only fires weekly, but it seens ...

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-07 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi, > > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package > which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I >

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > >> Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts >> > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. > > > I

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/06/2017 05:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts >> are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package >> which depends on

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-07 Thread nicolas . mailhot
Hi, Thank you both for starting to clean up the awful mess that URW fonts had become over time. It had come to the point they were totally unusable by anything but a few apps that hardcoded them. They were tripping many many users (countless why *awful things* happen as soon as I try to use

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/06/2017 05:49 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I created bugzilla for it

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-06 Thread R P Herrold
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts > > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. I don't see a urw-base35-fonts SRPM in my RawHide ... has it been packaged? My

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-06 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts > > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. > > NACK. They are _extra_ fonts: >

Re: Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-06 Thread Xose Vazquez Perez
Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts > are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. NACK. They are _extra_ fonts: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git;a=blob_plain;f=Resource/Init/Fontmap.GS

Removing ghostscript-fonts package

2017-10-06 Thread Zdenek Dohnal
Hi, I am going to retire ghostscript-fonts package in F27 because its fonts are deprecated and replaced by urw-base35-fonts package. Only package which depends on ghostscript-fonts seems to be hylafax+ package, I created bugzilla for it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1499240 . Does