Hi,
On 05/22/2012 02:55 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 13:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and
a drop in replacement for libusb1.
The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers
(almost all of the
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 13:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I plan to replace libusb1 with libusbx, libusx is a fork of and
> a drop in replacement for libusb1.
>
> The libusbx fork was started by various libusb-1.0 developers
> (almost all of them *), because the official maintainer of
after the fork went public, despite
various people including me asking for a release for ages (**)
shows that forking was necessary.
Anyways, I just included this tidbit to explain why I'm replacing
libusb1 with libusbx for Fedora-18 and later. Lets not look
backwards, but forwards towards what l
