On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:45:08PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
> >>
> >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of
On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
>>
>> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
>>
>> This package / review bug has been extensively
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
> >
> > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
> >
> > This package / review
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
>
> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
>
> This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
> on the review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697
I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity.
This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!)
on the review already. We are pretty sure it is in good shape now.
As it is a "C library" that is
