Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
Dne 08. 09. 23 v 22:42 Sandro napsal(a): I believe, and Miroslav will correct me if I'm wrong, the script looks at the changelog and searches for SPDX. As long as there's a changelog entry, the package is considered migrated. However, if the License: tag value changes, it is recommended to rebuild, so the new license makes it into the package. Of course, this can also be done with the next update or mass rebuild. Right. I cannot say it better :) -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On 08-09-2023 16:48, Sérgio Basto wrote: done [1] thanks , btw another question I don't need do a new build isn't it ? No, since there was no license change - in your case not even the specifier changed and if the license format changed , should we build a new release ? and in all branches or just in rawhide ? I believe, and Miroslav will correct me if I'm wrong, the script looks at the changelog and searches for SPDX. As long as there's a changelog entry, the package is considered migrated. However, if the License: tag value changes, it is recommended to rebuild, so the new license makes it into the package. Of course, this can also be done with the next update or mass rebuild. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 15:55 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Am Fr., 8. Sept. 2023 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Sérgio Basto > : > > > > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 08:39 +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if > > > > it > > > > is > > > > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog > > > > ? > > > > > > Something like: > > > > > > - Migrated to SPDX license (noop) > > > > > > > done [1] thanks , btw another question I don't need do a new build > > isn't it ? > > No, since there was no license change - in your case not even the > specifier changed :) > and if the license format changed , should we build a new release ? and in all branches or just in rawhide ? Thank you > Michael > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
Am Fr., 8. Sept. 2023 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Sérgio Basto : > > On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 08:39 +0200, Sandro wrote: > > On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it > > > is > > > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? > > > > Something like: > > > > - Migrated to SPDX license (noop) > > > > done [1] thanks , btw another question I don't need do a new build > isn't it ? No, since there was no license change - in your case not even the specifier changed :) Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On Fri, 2023-09-08 at 08:39 +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it > > is > > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? > > Something like: > > - Migrated to SPDX license (noop) > done [1] thanks , btw another question I don't need do a new build isn't it ? [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xdg-utils/c/2fdc5a60d2c08bf58f97cda5129d1b66a87332fc?branch=rawhide > will mark the package as migrated even if the License: value doesn't > change. Alternatively, you can submit it for the ignore list: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt > > -- Sandro > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On 08-09-2023 02:36, Sérgio Basto wrote: xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? Something like: - Migrated to SPDX license (noop) will mark the package as migrated even if the License: value doesn't change. Alternatively, you can submit it for the ignore list: https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
Dne 08. 09. 23 v 2:39 Neal Gompa napsal(a): xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? Do nothing. This transition is a no-op for you. Nope. If he does nothing I will still report it in statistics as: xdg-utils warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check To record that you checked it and it is ok do one of this: 1) add entry to %changelog "license migrated to SPDX" - this is more suitable when you are doing a rebase or change together with the check 2) add empty git commit: git commit --allow-empty -m "license migrated to SPDX" 3) report it to me and I will add it on ignore list. Or you can submit PR directly. I have just done it for you https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/c/a1bb78fdbe191ffc8dd31bd847e2e3299c42cc87?branch=main So **now** you can do nothing and next time your package will be counted as migrated. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:37 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is > already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ? > Do nothing. This transition is a no-op for you. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SPDX MIT license , what todo ?
Hi,
xdg-utils is a MIT License [1] what SPDX license have [2] ? if it is
already a valid SPDX formula , what I should write on changelog ?
Thank you
[1]
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/xdg-utils/-/blob/master/LICENSE?ref_type=heads
[2]
License-fedora2spdx MIT
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options:
['Adobe-Glyph', 'BSL-1.0', 'Boehm-GC', 'HP-1986', 'HPND-sell-variant',
'HPND', 'ICU', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-Festival', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-
enna', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT', 'NTP', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ',
'UnixCrypt', 'Xfig', 'libtiff', 'mpich2']
{{pick MIT choice}}
Note: the input is already valid SPDX formula, But that may be a
coincidence,
because the legacy identifier represented the whole family of licenses.
Please check if the license would match one of the licenses above.
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
