Il 13/07/22 21:11, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
> to work with these large updates if at all possible.
>
> Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
> skips our CI and feedback testing area.
Jul 13, 2022 1:13:38 PM Adam Williamson :
> If they need to be rebuilt for an API/ABI change, then by policy they
> should be grouped together. We do not want a situation where the
> API/ABI change gets pushed stable but some of the rebuilds do not, or
> vice versa.
We're not talking about
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 03:38:29PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
>
My 2 cents... we should try and get bodhi (and the rest of the pipeline)
to work with these large updates if at all possible.
Having releng merge tags works of course, but as Adam pointed out, it
skips our CI and feedback testing area. Additionally, it's more work to
releng folks and more
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 19:49 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update,
On 22/07/13 07:49PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I wonder if it would have made sense to have submitted those 300+
> builds in separate bodhi updates (at least in several smaller batches,
> if not individually)?
> At least in this case, that would've been a little bit more work, but
> would have
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> > and very-potentially-destabilizing
On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> and very-potentially-destabilizing change?
The go rebuilds in question are not very destabilizing, and they
Jul 13, 2022 10:45:02 AM Mattia Verga via devel :
> Meanwhile I'll keep an eye on the recent massive Golang update (which
> carries 315 builds...) to see if it shows any hiccups. (I'm quite
> surprised it didn't screw up already)
The recent 315 build F35 Bodhi update is not the first one that
On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 15:38 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
> but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
> some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
> things done
Bodhi is a nice interface to create multi-builds update from side-tags,
but it is not really optimized for massive updates. In the past we had
some troubles pushing updates with a lot of builds. There are too many
things done in the background that can break while processing a massive
update and
11 matches
Mail list logo
