On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:49 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to switch to
this? I created a wiki page for this:
Hi,
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to switch to
this? I created a wiki page for this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Till/update_availability_speedup_ideas
The basic idea is to create new
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to switch to
this? I created a wiki page for this:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 08:08:09AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to switch to
this? I created a wiki page for
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote:
the problem is you have to depsolve both sets of pkgs separately keeping
in mind stable vs unstable. And the depsolving impacts the multilib
selection (and vice versa).
I do not understand the problem, can you maybe give an example?
Does the current
Seth Vidal wrote:
If only 3 of those 5 make it through updates-testing into updates, then
you have to figure out if the other 3 actually need the versions of the
other 2 or if they can work with what's already available in GA or
updates.
How's that relevant to his proposal? Or more precisely:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
It seems to be missing something - it says 'all rpms that are not included
in the prior metadata will be deleted', but there's nothing in that proposal
as written that will cause rpms to fall out of the metadata.
It was probably to unclear. This
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to switch to
this? I created a wiki page for this:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
I have some ideas to speedup the availability of updates. Are there any
reasons except that the tools to do this do not exist yet, to
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:49:09PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said:
It seems to be missing something - it says 'all rpms that are not included
in the prior metadata will be deleted', but there's nothing in that
proposal
as written that will cause
10 matches
Mail list logo
