Re: Switch a package from noarch to arch - current guidelines?

2017-07-27 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > This was related to rubygem-bson and I switched the rubygem-bson from noarch > to arch in this commit: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/rubygem-bson.git/commit/?id=f507fa3ee0e8b29e60ef6164c28733691332dea4 >

Re: Switch a package from noarch to arch - current guidelines?

2017-07-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27.7.2017 v 16:56 Martin Langhoff napsal(a): > Turns out that Elixir should not be noarch, as some of its code is > endianness specific. What's best practice to switch away from noarch > for packages in current Fedora? How about EPEL? > > I see this outdated and unresolved Packaging Comittee

Switch a package from noarch to arch - current guidelines?

2017-07-27 Thread Martin Langhoff
Turns out that Elixir should not be noarch, as some of its code is endianness specific. What's best practice to switch away from noarch for packages in current Fedora? How about EPEL? I see this outdated and unresolved Packaging Comittee issue... https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/117