Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/8/23 19:30, Tom Callaway wrote: Please open a bug on this so I can track it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159178 On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 11:11 AM Orion Poplawski > wrote: On 1/4/23 17:52, Tom Callaway wrote: > Hi Fedora, > >

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Please open a bug on this so I can track it. Thanks, ~spot On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 11:11 AM Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 1/4/23 17:52, Tom Callaway wrote: > > Hi Fedora, > > > > TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in > > rawhide today. I've done extensive local

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/8/23 12:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:11:32AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: Seems to be breaking LaTeXML's tests: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/LaTeXML?collection=f38 Unfortunately koschei's query to see what else might be affected hits a gateway

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:11:32AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Seems to be breaking LaTeXML's tests: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/LaTeXML?collection=f38 > > Unfortunately koschei's query to see what else might be affected hits a > gateway timeout: > >

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/4/23 17:52, Tom Callaway wrote: Hi Fedora, TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that there are probably

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/6/23 13:50, Jerry James wrote: On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:41 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: First breakage seems to be here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080 Related to lua loading of otf fonts See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158837 Thanks.

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:20 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 4 2023 at 11:46:26 PM -0500, Tom Callaway > wrote: > > Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through > > that process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to > > revert those builds from

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:41 PM Michael J Gruber wrote: > First breakage seems to be here: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080 > > Related to lua loading of otf fonts See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158837 -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

First breakage seems to be here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95811080 Related to lua loading of otf fonts ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 5/01/2023 01:52, Tom Callaway wrote: Hi Fedora, TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that there are probably

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On Wed, Jan 4 2023 at 11:46:26 PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through that process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to revert those builds from rawhide? Seems excessive to use the change process for "Update component

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:47 AM Tom Callaway wrote: > > Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through that > process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to revert those > builds from rawhide? No, I don't think you need to revert it. The process is good to

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Hi, Spot! On Thursday, 05 January 2023 at 05:46, Tom Callaway wrote: > Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through that > process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to revert those > builds from rawhide? You still have time to submit it as a Self-Contained

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Despite the size, I don't think TL updates have ever gone through that process before. Not opposed to doing it though, do we need to revert those builds from rawhide? ~spot On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 10:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi Spot, > > > TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Hi Spot, > TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in > rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure > it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that > there are probably still some bugs introduced by

Re: TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

On 1/4/23 17:52, Tom Callaway wrote: Hi Fedora, TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that there are probably

TeXLive 2022 landing in rawhide today

Hi Fedora, TeXLive 2022 (composed of texlive-base and texlive SRPMs) is landing in rawhide today. I've done extensive local testing in mock to try to make sure it doesn't break anything obvious... but the size and scope of TL means that there are probably still some bugs introduced by this