Re: Updates push status - 20150725
Note the the issue was a silent abi change in the libraries around dnf. Had we not hit the atomic issue we would have pushed out the changed abi and likely broken updates on end users systems. It is a good thing that we hit it when and how we did. Dennis On July 31, 2015 3:54:18 AM CDT, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 31.07.2015 um 03:15 schrieb Johnny Robeson: On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So this useless Fedora Atomic toy now delayed updates (including security updates!) for everybody, i.e., also for the 99% of our users who do NOT use Atomic? I find it unacceptable that we are being held hostage by that kind of niche project (considering that one argument for adding support for it was that if we don't want to use it, it won't affect us). Please have respect for other peoples work. I expect to find this language on common web forums, but we can do better here well, the friendly version: something is terrible wrong designed in the build/deployment-environments when unrelated stuff failing leads to fail anything compose of atomic failed? so who cares, write a mail to the sysadmins and continue with the other repos and as long that is not possible Fedora should refrain from adding more and more install flavours and re-design how the things are technically managed internally before -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
Am 31.07.2015 um 03:15 schrieb Johnny Robeson: On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So this useless Fedora Atomic toy now delayed updates (including security updates!) for everybody, i.e., also for the 99% of our users who do NOT use Atomic? I find it unacceptable that we are being held hostage by that kind of niche project (considering that one argument for adding support for it was that if we don't want to use it, it won't affect us). Please have respect for other peoples work. I expect to find this language on common web forums, but we can do better here well, the friendly version: something is terrible wrong designed in the build/deployment-environments when unrelated stuff failing leads to fail anything compose of atomic failed? so who cares, write a mail to the sysadmins and continue with the other repos and as long that is not possible Fedora should refrain from adding more and more install flavours and re-design how the things are technically managed internally before signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So this useless Fedora Atomic toy now delayed updates (including security updates!) for everybody, i.e., also for the 99% of our users who do NOT use Atomic? I find it unacceptable that we are being held hostage by that kind of niche project (considering that one argument for adding support for it was that if we don't want to use it, it won't affect us). Kevin Kofler Please have respect for other peoples work. I expect to find this language on common web forums, but we can do better here. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
Kevin Fenzi wrote: Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So this useless Fedora Atomic toy now delayed updates (including security updates!) for everybody, i.e., also for the 99% of our users who do NOT use Atomic? I find it unacceptable that we are being held hostage by that kind of niche project (considering that one argument for adding support for it was that if we don't want to use it, it won't affect us). Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
On 07/28/2015 07:57 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. I guess no. I am waiting for my updates to get for weeks and am already withholding other followup updates. Folks, please think about the implications this kind of unreliability has on Fedora. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:57:44 +0300 Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote: Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. No. We continue to work on it. The current issue is some more issues with the f22-updates-testing atomic compose. A non announced abi break in a dependent package was found and we were hopeful that would solve things, but it didn't. The maintainer of rpm-ostree and bodhi have been working on it pretty much non stop yesterday. Hopefully we can get it solved today. kevin pgpCQdFPQ06nx.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:05:30 +0300 Alexander Ploumistos alex.ploumis...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: No. We continue to work on it. Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in the submission process. Nope. ;) Sorry for the confusion... We _finally_ have the updates push that started last thursday going out now. We are going to enable bodhi for fedora 23 after that finishes, do a f23-updates-testing push (should be very quick since it should only have a few packages in it), and then fire off a new 21/22 push. Hopefully tomorrow we can be back to normal. kevin pgpziGGGnHv9W.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: No. We continue to work on it. Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in the submission process. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Updates push status - 20150725
Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Updates push status - 20150725
Just a heads up before anyone asks about updates flow: I started a updates push thursday morning (20150723). It ran into some xml issues, and we cleared bodhi's cache of xml repodata and restarted things. Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So, we are (as always) working on getting things fixed up and pushed, but if you are wondering why updates are not flowing as fast as normal, that is why. kevin pgpTVbmuZB2kQ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
