Yes is there someone with more knowledge on this who could say what the
right procedure is for this case? If I do need to use a different name
package name, would I at least be able to have 'Provides: vault' in it?
I don't think there's a precedent yet for this package in other Linux
distros so I
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:12:41PM +, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> I made a ticket (bug #1806737) for the maintainer of the existing vault
> package in Fedora to see if he'd be willing to give it up so it can be
> used for Hashicorp vault (https://vaultproject.io) and he decided to
> mark it EOL so I
Il 24/02/20 23:12, Dave Dykstra ha scritto:
> I made a ticket (bug #1806737) for the maintainer of the existing vault
> package in Fedora to see if he'd be willing to give it up so it can be
> used for Hashicorp vault (https://vaultproject.io) and he decided to
> mark it EOL so I could claim it.
>
I made a ticket (bug #1806737) for the maintainer of the existing vault
package in Fedora to see if he'd be willing to give it up so it can be
used for Hashicorp vault (https://vaultproject.io) and he decided to
mark it EOL so I could claim it.
Dave
___
