Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

I've found that adding my google account to gnome online accounts makes this problem especially bad. Consider completely removing online accounts from gnome if you have any significant presence on the service (and if you don't why bother adding anyway?)

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories > metadata is maximum 10MB, > while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing > Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Friday, March 2, 2018 12:25:05 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, March 2, 2018 2:44:19 AM CET stan wrote: > >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - > >> "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: >

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > data as well as the original repodata. In My Honest Opinion, this is > not going away until the whole "let's keep this all in one database" > approach is discarded and individual small metadata files for each > RPM, which can be surveyed and updated individually, replace

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I feel like that discussion is ignoring a third option: keep file deps > built preprocess the repo metadata to turn each file dep that is > uniquely satisfied by a single package into a direct dependency on > that package. This

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

> On Mar 2, 2018, at 6:42 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:48:46PM +0330, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: >> I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in >> mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these questions. > > A

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 18:44 -0700, stan wrote: > On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - > "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: > > > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories > > metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" > > for

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM, chicago wrote: >>> Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of it

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM, chicago wrote: >> Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of it it >> change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? > > Most of it is pretty

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:46 AM, chicago wrote: > Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of it it > change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? Most of it is pretty stable. But it's database-stored, and it's compressed. Both cause the overall files

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote: > Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of > it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:48:46PM +0330, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote: > I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in > mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these questions. A very large chunk of it is this: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/714 --

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote: > Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of > it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, March 2, 2018 2:44:19 AM CET stan wrote: >> On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - >> "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: >> >> > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it? signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Friday, March 2, 2018 2:44:19 AM CET stan wrote: > On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - > "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: > > > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories > > metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" >

Re: Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 - "Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote: > Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories > metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" > for first time after installing Fedora 27 >

Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?

Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for two official repositories! It is really too high,