On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a
On 08/25/2010 01:39 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still trying to work out how to get systemctl to boot
my netbook into run level 5. The usual way of changing this
seems to have no effect and that is a problem.
There's a new question/answer just added to the systemd FAQ that
explains
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:41:52AM -0500, David Smith wrote:
I'm still trying to work out how to get systemctl to boot
my netbook into run level 5. The usual way of changing this
seems to have no effect and that is a problem.
RFE to make it a feature of systemctl:
Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) said:
I'm not saying that systemctl's syntax needs to be changed. I am saying,
however, that it's important to get the service command working with
systemctl so that people can use that instead.
FYI, this is done in git, will be built today/tomorrow.
Bill
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:51:11PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not saying that systemctl's syntax needs to be changed. I am saying,
however, that it's important to get the service command working with
systemctl so that people can use that instead.
FYI, this is done in git, will be
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is inconvienient for the common case where more than one action is
performed in sequence on the same service, since with the first
On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is inconvienient for the common case where more than one
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Interesting definition of important.
I said this before. User interfaces are important, even if they are command
line user interfaces. I use this program very, very often. All
Red-Hat-universe sysadmins do. To you, it may be an
On 08/24/2010 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is
Matthew Miller wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is inconvienient for the common case where more than one action is
performed in sequence on the same
On 08/24/2010 01:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 24.08.10 14:59, Matthew Miller (mat...@mattdm.org) wrote:
The service command has a syntax like this:
service servicename action
where as systemctl has a syntax like this:
systemctl action servicename.service
This is
11 matches
Mail list logo
