On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:14:20 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote:
fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Yeah, we should update that.
See also: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277
Uh, hasn't FESCo recently voted to allow submitters to karma up their own
packages if they're doing it in response to feedback from other people
coming through non-Bodhi channels?
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 09:55 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote:
fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so
It has been reported before and in
On 12/27/2011 10:55 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14436/geos-3.3.1-1.fc16
And an arguable abuse of the process, a submitter setting karma: 1 and then
giving their own update the requisite karma++ to get it pushed to stable
almost immediately. :(
--
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote:
fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so
It has been reported before and in the right place:
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/fawkes
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:43:02 +0100, FD (Francesco) wrote:
fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so
It has been reported before and in the right place:
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/fawkes
An update of geos is
fawkes-plugin-player.x86_64 require libgeos-3.3.0.so (64bit) but
geos.x86_64 package provides libgeos-3.3.1.so
-
[fdaluisio@tauron ~]$ sudo yum install fawkes-plugin-player
[sudo] password for fdaluisio:
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving
