Re: cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++

2020-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 06:05:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jerry James: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > >> It turns out it comes from dune (the build tool), although I'm still > >> unclear how and why. In any case I added a rather hacky workaround

Re: cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++

2020-04-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jerry James: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> It turns out it comes from dune (the build tool), although I'm still >> unclear how and why. In any case I added a rather hacky workaround so >> I can get the build going again: > > No, it isn't dune; it's ocaml itself

Re: cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++

2020-04-22 Thread Jerry James
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > It turns out it comes from dune (the build tool), although I'm still > unclear how and why. In any case I added a rather hacky workaround so > I can get the build going again: No, it isn't dune; it's ocaml itself. From "Changes" under

Re: cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++

2020-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
m/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fPIC > -I . -DUSEGLPK -g -o removed_criteria.o -c removed_criteria.cpp) > cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '

cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++

2020-04-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
d-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fPIC -I . -DUSEGLPK -g -o removed_criteria.o -c removed_criteria.cpp) cc1plus: sorry, unimplemented: '-fexcess-precision=standard' for C++ gcc src/notuptodate_criteria.o (exit 1) What I don't understand is where/what adds