On Friday, March 29, 2013 12:31:45 PM Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> On 03/29/2013 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > What was the package?
> GMP with configure 2.69 (apparently). Autoreconf -fi in use for a long time.
>
> Thank you for the confirmation. What is the right course of action
> expecte
On 2013-03-29, Frantisek Kluknavsky wrote:
> What is the right course of action expected from every affected
> packager? Add autoreconf -vfi and defer contacting upstream until we
> are competent?
If a package uses autotools and bundles old config.sub/guess which does
not support aarch64, then th
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> A few days. We ultimately do have some false positives but they are
> very few and far between.
>
You also have some false negatives. In my case, the cmusphinx3 and
sphinxtrain packages need fixing, but no bugs were filed for them. (I'm
f
On 03/29/2013 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
What was the package?
GMP with configure 2.69 (apparently). Autoreconf -fi in use for a long time.
Thank you for the confirmation. What is the right course of action
expected from every affected packager? Add autoreconf -vfi and defer
contacting u
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Frantisek Kluknavsky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong:
> Packagers do not have any real possibility to build and test packages on
> aarch64.
No they do not.
> Arm-koji is 32-bit arm.
> Packagers (some/many) do not even know their packages are sup
Hi,
Please correct me if I am wrong:
Packagers do not have any real possibility to build and test packages on
aarch64.
Arm-koji is 32-bit arm.
Packagers (some/many) do not even know their packages are supposed to
work on aarch64.
I decided to believe the bug report and contacted upstream. It
On 03/25/2013 01:36 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
What version of
automake added aarch64?
Autoamke 1.11.4, evidently.
--
Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/25/2013 02:16 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/25/2013 10:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
2.69 added it,
No - autoconf does not distribute config.guess/config.sub to packages.
It's automake.
Autoconf 2.69 is the first version of autoconf that included aarch64 in
its config.guess and con
On 03/25/2013 10:04 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
2.69 added it,
No - autoconf does not distribute config.guess/config.sub to packages.
It's automake.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 03/25/2013 02:50 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:36:17 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Isn't config.sub/config.guess really a part of automake and it is that that
needs updating by upstream? For instance, configure in octave 3.6.4 says it
was generated by autoconf 2.69, but
On 03/25/2013 09:36 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/08/2013 09:30 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 02/08/2013 07:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dennis Gilmore writes:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Hm, it woul
On Mon, 2013-03-25 at 15:03 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> automake -f -a -c
>
> to force it to copy in all needed files again.
Just run:
autoreconf -v -f -i
always. Better, ensure the upstream has an autogen.sh containing
whatever they need to do to build from actual revision control (as
op
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 09:30 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>
>> On 02/08/2013 07:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> Dennis Gilmore writes:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:36:17 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Isn't config.sub/config.guess really a part of automake and it is that that
> needs updating by upstream? For instance, configure in octave 3.6.4 says it
> was generated by autoconf 2.69, but the config.guess/config.sub files don't
>
On 02/08/2013 09:30 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 02/08/2013 07:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dennis Gilmore writes:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Hm, it would be much better in the long run to pester upstr
On 02/08/2013 07:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dennis Gilmore writes:
Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Hm, it would be much better in the long run to pester upstreams to
update to an appropriate version of thes
Dennis Gilmore writes:
> Additionally we will be mass patching config.guess and config.sub to
> support aarch64 in preperation for 64 bit arm support
Hm, it would be much better in the long run to pester upstreams to
update to an appropriate version of these files. Are the required
changes in up
17 matches
Mail list logo
