Ian Malone wrote:
No, what I mean is given its location how does udev ignore it and
systemd know to find it?
That's not what happens. Those are udev rules, they're installed by the
systemd package, but processed by udev (which sticks a uaccess tag on the
device, which is later used by systemd
Ian Malone wrote:
Interesting, not sure how you'd tell that. I've now noticed the header
#This file is part of systemd.
And rpm -qf confirms that, but why don't systemd and udev get into
conflict over it?
Because udev dropped their equivalent 70-acl.rules in favor of systemd's
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:22 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Or indeed, if anyone can show me where this is documented. All I've
managed to find with google are git commits and irrelevant mailing
list fragments. systemd-logind isn't documented,
/lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules appears to deal with
On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
Obviously things have
On 25 March 2012 13:22, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 March 2012 19:01, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
snip
Taken to systemd-devel.
--
imalone
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I put in a RFE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806534 for
a udev rule for the Fender Mustang amplifier and got a very quick
response from Kay Sievers (some needs to tell RedHat about weekends).
Obviously things have moved on since I last looked at permissions and
their use with
