On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 05:20:10 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Because -debuginfo is per SRPM, not per subpackage, so you can need the
> -debuginfo without having all subpackages (or even the main package)
> installed.
There could be for example: Conflicts: %{name} != %{version}-%{release}
But that
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 03:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> On Qui, 2016-11-03 at 06:57 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>>> > So we updated debuginfo, but didn't install the corresponding
>>> > packages.
>>> > That seems like a bug.
>> it isn't a bug , debuginfo packages doesn't require same
On Sex, 2016-11-04 at 10:12 +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 03:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > On Qui, 2016-11-03 at 06:57 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So we updated debuginfo, but didn't install the corresponding
> > > > packages.
> > > > That seems like
On 11/03/2016 04:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2016-11-03 at 06:57 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
So we updated debuginfo, but didn't install the corresponding
packages.
That seems like a bug.
it isn't a bug , debuginfo packages doesn't require same version of
counter part and vice-versa .
On 11/03/2016 03:08 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2016-11-03 at 06:57 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> > So we updated debuginfo, but didn't install the corresponding
>> > packages.
>> > That seems like a bug.
> it isn't a bug , debuginfo packages doesn't require same version of
> counter part
On Qui, 2016-11-03 at 06:57 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> sudo dnf update
> ...
> updates 77 k
> mercurial-debuginfo x86_64 4.0-
> 1.fc24
> ...
> nbecker-mercurial-3 190 k
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
> mercurial
sudo dnf update
...
updates 77 k
mercurial-debuginfo x86_64 4.0-1.fc24
...
nbecker-mercurial-3 190 k
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
mercurial x86_64 4.0-1.fc24
