Re: dxflib ABI changed yet nothing changed
Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Got via e-mail that libdxflib's ABI changed in comparison to previous > release, yet nothing changed in the package except version bump for the mass > rebuild. Why is that? I got similar mails about mysql++ – type changes that seem to consist entirely of "type size hasn't changed" and "no data member change", but these say "NEEDS_INSPECTION" instead of "FAILED": dist.abicheck NEEDS_INSPECTION for mysql++-3.2.4-2.fc30 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/f71962be-270c-11e9-9c24-525400fc9f92/tests.yml/mysql++-3.2.4-2.fc30.log dist.abicheck NEEDS_INSPECTION for mysql++-3.2.4-2.fc30 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/f782031e-270c-11e9-9451-525400fc9f92/tests.yml/mysql++-3.2.4-2.fc30.log Björn Persson pgpmAcxcw_S7s.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: dxflib ABI changed yet nothing changed
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:27 PM Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > > Hi, > > Got via e-mail that libdxflib's ABI changed in comparison to previous > release, yet nothing changed in the package except version bump for the mass > rebuild. Why is that? Got that for a package too, and the major thing that changed between the two build is GCC so that could be an optimization bug or undefined behavior leading to a different interpretation now? Hard to say, I didn't look at the ABI differences. Dridi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
dxflib ABI changed yet nothing changed
Hi, Got via e-mail that libdxflib's ABI changed in comparison to previous release, yet nothing changed in the package except version bump for the mass rebuild. Why is that? Digest Summary: 1. dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 2. dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 --- (2019-02-04 05:48:12 UTC) dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 - https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/f7d968de-26bc-11e9-a292-525400fc9f92/tests.yml/libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30.log dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 --- (2019-02-04 05:48:16 UTC) dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 - https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/f7c055d8-26bc-11e9-9451-525400fc9f92/tests.yml/libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30.log dist.abicheck FAILED for libdxflib-3.17.0-8.fc30 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
