Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 09. 19 13:35, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy:

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:48 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > > unretired and they still fail to build from source. > > > > Following the policy: > >

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 08. 19 19:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I kindly ask

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-14 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 14. 08. 19 12:54, Peter Robinson wrote: Well you can't currently see the forest for the trees and this bullshit, for the first time in 15 years in making me think about quitting the Fedora project, and I spoke with many at Flock are seriously stressed about it and sick of it. I will be

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-14 Thread Peter Robinson
> On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long > > standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could > > completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric > > a bit here. > > It has been half a year

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 08. 19 19:43, Peter Robinson wrote: Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric a bit here. It has been half a year without any response.

Re: efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Peter Robinson
Firstly they're just FTBFS in F-30 This isn't exactly long standing, if it was F-26 like some that were retired I could completely understand that statement but F-30 is pushing the rhetoric a bit here. > efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then > unretired

efivar and mokutil long standing FTBFS

2019-08-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
efivar and mokutil fail to build from source. They have been retired, then unretired and they still fail to build from source. Following the policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ I kindly ask the maintainers to rebuild them or orphan