W dniu 6 sierpnia 2011 14:41 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> W dniu 12 lipca 2011 22:45 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> I tested it, but it still corrupts data. On Thursday I'll do more
>> tests.
>
> Sorry for the nearly month delay :)
>
> Today I tried to copy a file over samb
W dniu 12 lipca 2011 22:45 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> I tested it, but it still corrupts data. On Thursday I'll do more
> tests.
Sorry for the nearly month delay :)
Today I tried to copy a file over samba to my encrypted dir and
operation still fails.
When I tried to copy a file fr
W dniu 12 lipca 2011 18:23 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
napisał:
>>> ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all
>>> of
>>> them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to
>>> reproduce original problem nor valgrind complaint, so please
>> ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all
>> of
>> them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to
>> reproduce original problem nor valgrind complaint, so please test if
>> following package produces memcpy complain in valgrin
W dniu 11 lipca 2011 18:28 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
napisał:
> On 07/11/2011 06:05 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:57 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
>> napisał:
>>>
>>> On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 uż
On 07/11/2011 06:05 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:57 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
> napisał:
>> On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
>>> napisał:
ok, complain about memcpy in
W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:57 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
napisał:
> On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
>> napisał:
>>>
>>> ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of
>>> them and I thin
On 07/11/2011 05:40 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
> napisał:
>> ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of
>> them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to
>> reproduce original pro
Hi,
W dniu 11 lipca 2011 17:09 użytkownik Michal Hlavinka
napisał:
> ok, complain about memcpy in ecryptfs-utils is gone. I've checked all of
> them and I think I've fixed those which needed it. I was not able to
> reproduce original problem nor valgrind complaint, so please test if
> following p
W dniu 8 lipca 2011 18:21 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab:
>> Use valgrind.
>
> I attach valgrind output.
>
> ==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116:
> ==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef
CC'ing devel
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
Od: Michał Piotrowski
Data: 9 lipca 2011 10:59
Temat: Re: glibc 2.14-4 eats my data (Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba =
data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output
error" on different dis
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:27:45PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> memove should be used if areas overlap that are being copied.
If they overlap or may overlap.
Jakub
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/08/2011 01:19 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/7/8 Jakub Jelinek:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc.
So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it.
The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaro
2011/7/8 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc.
>
> So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it.
> The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaround
> buggy old programs was just for prog
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:12:04PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> So it does appear to be related to the memcpy change in libc.
So eCryptfs is buggy, just fix it.
The compatibility stuff that has been added to glibc to workaround
buggy old programs was just for programs linked against old glibc.
If y
On 07/08/2011 12:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 8 lipca 2011 18:21 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
Hi,
2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab:
Use valgrind.
I attach valgrind output.
==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116:
==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef159
W dniu 8 lipca 2011 18:21 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab :
>> Use valgrind.
>
> I attach valgrind output.
>
> ==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116:
> ==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef1593, 76)
> ==1312== at 0x4C283B6: me
Hi,
2011/7/8 Andreas Schwab :
> Use valgrind.
I attach valgrind output.
==1312== 1 errors in context 1 of 116:
==1312== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0xaef1590, 0xaef1593, 76)
==1312==at 0x4C283B6: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14 (mc_replace_strmem.c:653)
==1312==by 0x401835: ??? (in /sbin
Use valgrind.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/7/7 Nathanael D. Noblet :
> On 07/07/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hmmm... wonder if this is somehow related to glibc changing memcpy that
>> caused problem in flash and squashfs?
>
> I thought that happened in F14. so I would expect it to have been
> discovered already if that was the
On 07/07/2011 12:38 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Hmmm... wonder if this is somehow related to glibc changing memcpy that
> caused problem in flash and squashfs?
I thought that happened in F14. so I would expect it to have been
discovered already if that was the case?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.87
On 07/07/2011 01:13 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
When I did a glibc downgrade to 2.13.90-9 eCryptfs mount problem no
longer appears, also there is no data corruption problem. Glibc
changes somehow breaks eCryptfs and probably also samba.
W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:25 użytkownik Michał Piotrowsk
Hi,
When I did a glibc downgrade to 2.13.90-9 eCryptfs mount problem no
longer appears, also there is no data corruption problem. Glibc
changes somehow breaks eCryptfs and probably also samba.
W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:25 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:13 użytkownik
23 matches
Mail list logo