Re: gpg check failure installing from rawhide
Dne 11. 03. 20 v 1:12 Sam Varshavchik napsal(a): > Kevin Fenzi writes: > >> On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >> > Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and >> install >> > the latest kernel from rawhide. >> > >> > The Bugzilla template says: >> > >> > 5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To >> install the >> > Rawhide kernel, run “sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide“ >> followed by >> > “sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel“: >> > >> > On F31, right now, 'dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel' wants >> to install >> > 5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33, which fails the gpg check: >> > >> > Public key for kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not >> > installed. Failing package is: >> kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 >> > GPG Keys are configured as: >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-x86_64 >> > >> > So, something, somewhere, needs to be fixed, either the Bugzilla >> template, >> > or something related to signing. >> >> Hum, yeah, thats a though one. >> >> I guess the better command might be: >> >> sudo dnf update --releasever 33 --enablerepo rawhide kernel >> >> but of course there's no way to know '33' is right there unless you >> know. This could be made better moving forward when we land the >> 'rawhide' is called 'rawhide' and not the number change. > > That attempt still doesn't quite work: > > Warning: > /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/kernel-5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm: > Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9570ff31: NOKEY > Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for t 0.0 B/s | 0 B > 00:00 > Curl error (37): Couldn't read a file:// file for > file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64 [Couldn't open > file /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64] > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful > transaction. > > After doing a whatprovides on that, ended up install > fedora-gpg-keys-33 with nogpgcheck. That allowed the rawhide kernel > package to be installed. > > Of course, installing fedora-gpg-keys-33 conveniently uninstalled > fedora-gpg-keys-31. Can't win 'em all. It seems that fedora-repos-31-1 does not contain F33 GPG key, which should be fixed. You probably want to open ticket against fedora-repos. Vít > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg check failure installing from rawhide
Kevin Fenzi writes: On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and install > the latest kernel from rawhide. > > The Bugzilla template says: > > 5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the > Rawhide kernel, run “sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide“ followed by > “sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel“: > > On F31, right now, 'dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel' wants to install > 5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33, which fails the gpg check: > > Public key for kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not > installed. Failing package is: kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31- x86_64 > > So, something, somewhere, needs to be fixed, either the Bugzilla template, > or something related to signing. Hum, yeah, thats a though one. I guess the better command might be: sudo dnf update --releasever 33 --enablerepo rawhide kernel but of course there's no way to know '33' is right there unless you know. This could be made better moving forward when we land the 'rawhide' is called 'rawhide' and not the number change. That attempt still doesn't quite work: Warning: /var/cache/dnf/rawhide-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/kernel-5.6.0-0.rc5.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9570ff31: NOKEY Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for t 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 Curl error (37): Couldn't read a file:// file for file:///etc/pki/rpm- gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64 [Couldn't open file /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM- GPG-KEY-fedora-33-x86_64] The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. After doing a whatprovides on that, ended up install fedora-gpg-keys-33 with nogpgcheck. That allowed the rawhide kernel package to be installed. Of course, installing fedora-gpg-keys-33 conveniently uninstalled fedora-gpg- keys-31. Can't win 'em all. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: gpg check failure installing from rawhide
On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:47:03AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and install > the latest kernel from rawhide. > > The Bugzilla template says: > > 5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the > Rawhide kernel, run “sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide“ followed by > “sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel“: > > On F31, right now, 'dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel' wants to install > 5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33, which fails the gpg check: > > Public key for kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not > installed. Failing package is: kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 > GPG Keys are configured as: > file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31-x86_64 > > So, something, somewhere, needs to be fixed, either the Bugzilla template, > or something related to signing. Hum, yeah, thats a though one. I guess the better command might be: sudo dnf update --releasever 33 --enablerepo rawhide kernel but of course there's no way to know '33' is right there unless you know. This could be made better moving forward when we land the 'rawhide' is called 'rawhide' and not the number change. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
gpg check failure installing from rawhide
Trying to follow the direction for a bug report against kernel, and install the latest kernel from rawhide. The Bugzilla template says: 5. Does this problem occur with the latest Rawhide kernel? To install the Rawhide kernel, run “sudo dnf install fedora-repos-rawhide“ followed by “sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel“: On F31, right now, 'dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide kernel' wants to install 5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33, which fails the gpg check: Public key for kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: kernel-core-5.6.0-0.rc4.git0.1.fc33.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-31- x86_64 So, something, somewhere, needs to be fixed, either the Bugzilla template, or something related to signing. pgpY9zzIiGkep.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
