Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require. That might be the best way to resolve that. Right, the correct solution is to put this into a gtk-common subpackage required by both gtk2 and gtk3.

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Colin Walters wrote: In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss not shipping gtk2 in the default image, we can revisit this issue =) For now, keeping it in gtk2 seems fine to me. I don't see a good reason not to do the right thing right now. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-11 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds like the gtk-update-icon-cache programs could be pushed into their own subpackage that both gtk2 and gtk3 require.  That might be the best way to resolve that. In the Fedora 18+ timeframe where we might discuss

gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Matthias Clasen
I have just tagged gtk3-2.99.0 into rawhide. There are abi and api changes, so all dependent packages will have to be rebuilt (the most obvious change is that the libraries are now called libg[dt]k-3.0.so instead of libg[gt]k-x11-3.0.so). There are a number of api changes that I am not going to

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes: MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in MC the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post MC of a gtk3-using package, you should

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes: MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in MC the gtk2 package). If you are using gtk-update-icon-cache in %post MC

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 15:00 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: I have built most packages that had a gtk3 dependency already, and tagged them into rawhide. The following are the leftovers: libindicator-gtk3 I see you committed a bump+rebuild but didn't actually push a build, AFAICT - I can't see

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes: MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been MC dropped (since they were identical to their un-suffixed cousins in MC the gtk2 package). If you are using

Re: gtk2 2.99.0

2011-01-10 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:54:56PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 14:13 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: MC == Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com writes: MC * gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0 and gtk-builder-convert-3.0 have been MC dropped (since they were identical to