Re: incompatible upgrade of apache traffic server

2012-06-29 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ? I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote -1 There is

Re: incompatible upgrade of apache traffic server

2012-06-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/27/2012 12:26 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Looking trough the exceptions lists on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases: Things that would make it more likely to grant a request: * The package is a leaf node. Nothing depends on it or requires it.

Re: incompatible upgrade of apache traffic server

2012-06-27 Thread Gregor Tätzner
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 20:56:24 Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Will it be OK to do this upgrade in F15/F16/F17, or are we stuck on v3.0 ? I'm not a user of this particular apache service, but in general I would vote -1 There is a reason why those update policies exist: Fedora is no rolling

incompatible upgrade of apache traffic server

2012-06-26 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
I would like to upgrade Apache Traffic Server (ATS) from v3.0.x to new stable branch v3.2.x. The 3.2 branch has lots of improvements for IPv6 and SSL that are important to me, and also fixes a crash I've been hitting in v3.0. But, unfortunately there are a couple of incompatible config file