Re: irqbalance doesn't balance well x86_64 Fedora 16

2011-10-31 Thread Neil Horman
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:24:34PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.10.2011 22:04, schrieb Lucas: > > I do not understand why it places i915, eth0 and snd_hda_intel on the same > > CPU > > uname -a = 3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 12:18:13 UTC 2011 x86_64 > > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Lin

Re: irqbalance doesn't balance well x86_64 Fedora 16

2011-10-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.10.2011 22:04, schrieb Lucas: > I do not understand why it places i915, eth0 and snd_hda_intel on the same CPU > uname -a = 3.1.0-1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 12:18:13 UTC 2011 x86_64 > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Any thoughts? because it is useless to speard on all present cores with

irqbalance doesn't balance well x86_64 Fedora 16

2011-10-29 Thread Lucas
Dear All I would like to tell that irqbalance doesn't balance irqs properly: 0:126 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 1 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge