Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-18 Thread Michael J Gruber
Please build in the side-tag to pick up the new jbig2dec/mupdf: fedpkg build --target=f34-build-side-30401 I guess we need to coordinate how far this gets merged down (f33, f32). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-18 Thread Michael J Gruber
Thanks for the input. I don't mind learning how to do this ;) Just to confirm that I picked the right path (from various I found documented): fedpkg request-side-tag --base-tag rawhide fedpkg build --target= .. and wait for all of us to the builds, before using: bodhi updates new --from-tag

Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-18 Thread Anna Khaitovich
Hi Michael, > Given how previous updates went I intend to try a side-tag now. +1 for side-tag approach. The only question I have is who is going to coordinate those updates? For example, I already have an update for gs 9.53 for Rawhide prepared, should I create the side-tag, or should I wait

Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:19:33PM -, Michael J Gruber wrote: > ... this or build root overrides, but what about rawhide? rawhide can use side tags as well... is that the question? sidetags are in general much better than buildroot overrides (IMHO). kevin signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
... this or build root overrides, but what about rawhide? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

jbig2dec 0.19

2020-09-17 Thread Michael J Gruber
There is a new version of jbig2dec which the new version of ghostscript requires. Given how previous updates went I intend to try a side-tag now. If you think your package is affected then please follow the discussion at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877889 Also, if there are