On 04/05/2011 07:21 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 09:13 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
This is my first experience with a
critpath update, so I'm feeling pretty ignorant of how it's supposed
to work. If I still need a proventester, what kind of bribe do I need
to offer?
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:05 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
Really, just offer some instructions on how to test it in your plea. I
saw this update several times and skipped over it since I didn't really
know how to properly test it and didn't bother taking the time to figure
it out.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Hi all,
The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task
On 04/01/2011 08:13 AM, Jerry James wrote:
And, as an aside, that update still only has karma of 2. How do I
tell if either of the respondents is a proventester? Is that
indicated in the feedback somehow?
Their nick would show up as username (proventester) instead of just
username. A
Hi all,
The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
comaintainers:
Io-language: limb
asterisk: jcollie, fabbione, itamarjp
ceph: josef
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 10:34 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
Hi all,
The latest libedit update is CRITPATH, so it needs some karma. The
direct consumers of libedit, if my repoquery-fu is up to the task, are
the following, with their maintainers listed first, followed by
comaintainers:
Io
I just built a new libedit snapshot (20110227) for Rawhide and F-15 to
pick up some bug fixes. This rebuild doesn't involve an soname
change, but I thought I should give a heads-up anyway, for two
reasons.
First, I previously did an update to the 20100424 snapshot on February
7, the same day as
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that libedit provides the entire readline API. I'll
block out some time to compare the two, hopefully tomorrow but
possibly not until the end of the week. I'll follow up here when I've
done that.
It does
Jerry James wrote:
In particular, the latest version includes wide character (Unicode)
support.
So, is it time to replace the old unmaintained compat-readline5 which is
kept only for licensing reasons with this now?
And would it make sense to try to replace readline with libedit systemwide,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
So, is it time to replace the old unmaintained compat-readline5 which is
kept only for licensing reasons with this now?
And would it make sense to try to replace readline with libedit systemwide,
even? It feels quite
I need a libedit update to attempt to resolve bug #511303. In particular,
the latest version includes wide character (Unicode) support. I've just
done the rebuild. This should not effect other programs that use libedit,
but just in case, check your programs for any weirdness. If I've broken
11 matches
Mail list logo
