Re: libtommath minor soname bump
František Šumšal wrote: > I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective > shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all > dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be > necessary: That is not an soname bump then. :-) The soname is just what is written in the DT_SONAME field, which is what the applications end up depending on, and is in this case "libtommath.so.1". It typically only includes the major soversion (e.g., 1), not the full version (e.g., 1.2.1). "libtommath.so.1.2.1" is the fully versioned name, but a bump of that name should have no effect on applications (unless upstream either does not understand soversioning or made an inadvertent mistake). If you find something in such a minor version bump that (unexpectedly) requires applications to be rebuilt, then you should urge upstream to bump the major soversion and hence the soname (so that they would ship, e.g., libtommath.so.2→libtommath.so.2.0.0 instead of libtommath.so.1→libtommath.so.1.2.1), but this does not seem to be the case here. Hence, no bump of the major soversion is needed, and hence, no announcement is needed either. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libtommath minor soname bump
On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 22:40, František Šumšal wrote: [...] > Both abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff seem to be happy, i.e. there were no > added/changed/removed symbols between 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, so the bump > should be safe. Excellent, this means the version update should be transparent to any package depending on the library. You do not have to announce such updates here. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libtommath minor soname bump
On 9/7/23 11:40, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: Hello, I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. <...no results...> Please correct me if I'm missing something. Your first step should be checking for any ABI changes using abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff. Only if there are removed symbols do you need to worry about rebuilding consumers. However, added unversioned symbols do mean that backwards compatibility is not preserved (i.e. an application built against a newer version, say 1.2.1, might not work with 1.2.0 installed if it depends on a symbol introduced in 1.2.1). Thanks for the pointers, much appreciated! Both abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff seem to be happy, i.e. there were no added/changed/removed symbols between 1.2.0 and 1.2.1, so the bump should be safe. Cheers, Frantisek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libtommath minor soname bump
On Thursday, 07 September 2023 at 11:13, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective > shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all > dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: > > $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' > Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. > dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 > firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 > libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 > libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 > libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 > libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 > libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 > libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 > moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 > moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 > > $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' > Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. > <...no results...> > > Please correct me if I'm missing something. Your first step should be checking for any ABI changes using abipkgdiff and rpmsodiff. Only if there are removed symbols do you need to worry about rebuilding consumers. However, added unversioned symbols do mean that backwards compatibility is not preserved (i.e. an application built against a newer version, say 1.2.1, might not work with 1.2.0 installed if it depends on a symbol introduced in 1.2.1). Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
libtommath minor soname bump
Hello, I plan to bump libtommath to 1.2.1 in Rawhide, which bumps the respective shared library to libtommath.so.1.2.1. According to repoquery all dependencies depend only on libtommath.1, so no rebuild should be necessary: $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:20:29 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. dropbear-0:2022.82-3.fc39.x86_64 firebird-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.i686 libfbclient2-0:4.0.3.2975-1.fc39.x86_64 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.i686 libtomcrypt-0:1.18.2-17.fc39.x86_64 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.i686 libtommath-devel-0:1.2.0-13.fc40.x86_64 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.i686 moarvm-0:2023.06-1.fc39.x86_64 $ dnf repoquery --releasever rawhide --whatrequires 'libtommath.so.1.*' Last metadata expiration check: 0:21:06 ago on Thu Sep 7 10:34:05 2023. <...no results...> Please correct me if I'm missing something. Cheers, Frantisek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
