Dne 29.2.2012 20:13, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
unless we move away from using master for rawhide and instead always
have a specific branch for each release.
Please don't do that. Thank you.
Vit
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 29.2.2012 06:05, Mathieu Bridon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 05:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Koflerkevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't
On 2/28/12 12:58 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
makes no sense. It might work for other
On 2/28/12 8:47 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master
branch (for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as
that would break git's ability to work offline. The best I could
come up with at the time this code was written was to
Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com writes:
On 2/28/12 12:58 AM, VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
On 2/29/12 1:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com writes:
On 2/28/12 12:58 AM, VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 16:25:22 -0500,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
In the particular case here it was harmless, since I would've just gone
and built the identical SRPM in f17 a bit later anyway, and (I trust)
rawhide will inherit the new f17 package too.
I believe rawhide still
Dne 28.2.2012 02:59, Jesse Keating napsal(a):
On 2/27/12 5:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master branch
(for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as that
would
break git's ability to work offline. The
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how?
git pull
(to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18)
Vít Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
makes no sense. It might work for other branches, but master is
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
makes no sense.
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote machine? Why it takes the %{?dist} from local machine instead? It
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 05:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
VÃt Ondruch wrote:
If you say to Koji that it should checkout master at remote machine,
build a SRPM etc, why the Koji can't determine the proper %{?dist} at
remote
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I would certainly be very confused if `fedpkg mockbuild` produced a f17
rpm but `fedpkg build` produced an f18 one.
build is the common case and should always work; srpm, mockbuild etc. are
extras, I don't care if they break.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
I'm definitely checked out in the master branch:
[tgl@rh3 master]$ git push
Counting objects: 11, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done.
Writing objects: 100% (6/6), 1.13 KiB, done.
Total 6 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0)
To
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm definitely checked out in the master branch:
[tgl@rh3 master]$ git push
Counting objects: 11, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done.
Writing objects: 100% (6/6), 1.13 KiB, done.
Total 6 (delta 3), reused
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how?
git pull
(to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18)
Hmm, that package indeed hadn't had f17 git pull'd yet. (I had scripted
a git pull in all my package
Dne 27.2.2012 17:09, Tom Lane napsal(a):
I'm definitely checked out in the master branch:
[tgl@rh3 master]$ git push
Counting objects: 11, done.
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (6/6), done.
Writing objects: 100% (6/6), 1.13 KiB, done.
Total 6 (delta 3), reused
On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com writes:
On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how?
git pull
(to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18)
Hmm, that package indeed hadn't had f17 git pull'd yet. (I had
Jesse Keating wrote:
I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master branch
(for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as that would
break git's ability to work offline. The best I could come up with at
the time this code was written was to check and see what
On 2/27/12 5:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master branch
(for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as that would
break git's ability to work offline. The best I could come up with at
the time this code
22 matches
Mail list logo
