On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:30 PM David Cantrell wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> >> packages because we don't want
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
standard", it is demonstrably a
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:21:15PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 11:22, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > So: RH Java packagers, what if you build these packages as non-modular
> > >
On Friday, 18 September 2020 at 11:22, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > So: RH Java packagers, what if you build these packages as non-modular
> > (maybe using some scripting to make it happen at the same time as modular
> > builds?) and
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> So: RH Java packagers, what if you build these packages as non-modular
> (maybe using some scripting to make it happen at the same time as modular
> builds?) and add a readme explaining their maintenance state?
Do you mean
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:16:11AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > I mean, some of y'all like to maintain and keep obscure dependency
> > packages up to date just for their own sake, and that's *awesome* -- but
> > we just can't hold everyone to that standard. At least, not
Matthew Miller wrote:
> I mean, some of y'all like to maintain and keep obscure dependency
> packages up to date just for their own sake, and that's *awesome* -- but
> we just can't hold everyone to that standard. At least, not if we want
> more than a few dozen packagers.
That is a pretty strong
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 13:30 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 12:53, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> > > packages because we don't
On 18/9/20 03:43, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> 'its broke'
>> 'yes I know its broke.. I just need the header files'
>> 'well I need it to work' 'well fix it yourself'
>> 'no that is your job.. it says you OWN THE PACKAGE'.
>> 'I
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:30:26PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 'its broke'
> 'yes I know its broke.. I just need the header files'
> 'well I need it to work' 'well fix it yourself'
> 'no that is your job.. it says you OWN THE PACKAGE'.
> 'I just own it to build foobar'
> 'too bad.. i am
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 12:53, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> > packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
> > standard", it is demonstrably
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> If one of the issues here can be stated as "we want buildroot-only
> packages because we don't want to maintain those packages to a high
> standard", it is demonstrably a viable choice within Fedora to just
> *not maintain those
12 matches
Mail list logo
