Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
This build has the pdf file with a different timestamp in the i686 and
x86_64 build.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4189461
The pdf file is /usr/share/doc/libbluray-devel-0.2.2/libbluray.pdf from
libbluray-devel-0.2.2-2.fc18
it's a bug in pdftex (part of texlive package) which is used to create pdf
files. pdftex writes the timestamps CreationDate (%s) and ModDate (%s)
into PDF files.
extract from texk/web2c/pdftexdir/utils.c
---
void printcreationdate()
{
initstarttime();
pdf_printf(/CreationDate (%s)\n, start_time_str);
}
void printmoddate()
{
initstarttime();
pdf_printf(/ModDate (%s)\n, start_time_str);
}
---
Than
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On 06/20/2012 04:26 PM, Than Ngo wrote: I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to build the package I have issue with for F18 asap. it doesn't effect doxygen-1.8.0 in f17 and i don't plan to update new version in f17 yet So the newer doxygen doesn't help with the pdf file. I think the issue is the default header and footer when no LATEX_HEADER and LATEX_FOOTER are provided in the doxygen-config contain the timestamp. Should that be considered as a doxygen bug ? could you please provide a reproduce for this issue? This build has the pdf file with a different timestamp in the i686 and x86_64 build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4189461 The pdf file is /usr/share/doc/libbluray-devel-0.2.2/libbluray.pdf from libbluray-devel-0.2.2-2.fc18 Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 06/20/2012 04:26 PM, Than Ngo wrote: I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to build the package I have issue with for F18 asap. it doesn't effect doxygen-1.8.0 in f17 and i don't plan to update new version in f17 yet So the newer doxygen doesn't help with the pdf file. I think the issue is the default header and footer when no LATEX_HEADER and LATEX_FOOTER are provided in the doxygen-config contain the timestamp. Should that be considered as a doxygen bug ? could you please provide a reproduce for this issue? This build has the pdf file with a different timestamp in the i686 and x86_64 build. That's not a problem (and won't cause conflicts). -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to build the package I have issue with for F18 asap. it doesn't effect doxygen-1.8.0 in f17 and i don't plan to update new version in f17 yet So the newer doxygen doesn't help with the pdf file. I think the issue is the default header and footer when no LATEX_HEADER and LATEX_FOOTER are provided in the doxygen-config contain the timestamp. Should that be considered as a doxygen bug ? could you please provide a reproduce for this issue? Thanks Than -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On 06/13/2012 08:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Xavier Bachelot wrote: Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. pretty sure these are all a doxygen packaging bug, it is supposed to default timestamps to off, but doesn't erroneously. I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to build the package I have issue with for F18 asap. Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On 06/14/2012 05:29 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: On 06/13/2012 08:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: Xavier Bachelot wrote: Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. pretty sure these are all a doxygen packaging bug, it is supposed to default timestamps to off, but doesn't erroneously. I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex Thanks for all the answers and thanks for the fixed doxygen. I'll try to build the package I have issue with for F18 asap. So the newer doxygen doesn't help with the pdf file. I think the issue is the default header and footer when no LATEX_HEADER and LATEX_FOOTER are provided in the doxygen-config contain the timestamp. Should that be considered as a doxygen bug ? Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
Hi, Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. Alternatively, I can probably put the doc files in a noarch -doc subpackage, or even don't generate the pdf file at all, but I'd rather fix the issue in a different way. Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 11:12:18 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote: I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, Could you suggest how in: popt-devel.i586 conflicts with popt-devel.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533829 or even don't generate the pdf file at all, but I'd rather fix the issue in a different way. It would be nice to standardize what formats of doc are shipped, I tried it in [Fedora-packaging] HTML format preferred over INFO documents http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2011-February/007634.html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/HtmlDocs But it did not get accepted. Currently gdb-doc ships info + html + pdf. Thanks, Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. The only official doc is on how to modify the html footer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Doxygen_footers To my knowledge, doxygen was not generating different PDFs on each separate build until recently. There was no need for instructions for PDFs. Alternatively, I can probably put the doc files in a noarch -doc subpackage, or even don't generate the pdf file at all, but I'd rather fix the issue in a different way. Yes I think these are the only options at the time. Best, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
On 06/13/2012 01:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: Hi, Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. The only official doc is on how to modify the html footer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Doxygen_footers To my knowledge, doxygen was not generating different PDFs on each separate build until recently. There was no need for instructions for PDFs. Alternatively, I can probably put the doc files in a noarch -doc subpackage, or even don't generate the pdf file at all, but I'd rather fix the issue in a different way. Yes I think these are the only options at the time. I don't think the noarch subpackage option will work because I seem to recall the sub-packages from the different arch builds get compared at the end of the koji task and the build fails if the noarch sub-packages are not all the same. Or is that a figment of my imagination? Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org writes: Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. Yeah, I find that the sgml to pdf toolchain also likes to put timestamps into the PDF file. The solution I've used for many years is to build the PDF doc once during package preparation, and upload it as an additional sources file. This eliminates the timestamp skew problem and also greatly reduces the BuildRequires footprint of the package. You can look into the postgresql package if you want to borrow any details (the generate-pdf.sh script is probably pretty postgresql specific, but the packaging details around its use might be worth stealing). regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
Xavier Bachelot wrote: Does anyone have any pointer on how to fix a multilib conflict with a doxygen generated pdf file ? I was able to fix the same multilib issue with the html files by modifying the footer to not include the timestamp, but I don't find any pointer on how to proceed for the pdf file. pretty sure these are all a doxygen packaging bug, it is supposed to default timestamps to off, but doesn't erroneously. I think I got this fixed in doxygen-1.8.1.1-2.fc18 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=325050 I'll talk to than about getting a fixed build for f17 too -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: multilib conflict with doxygen generated pdf
Orcan Ogetbil wrote: The only official doc is on how to modify the html footer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Doxygen_footers Please do NOT add such workarounds to all packages. The doxygen maintainer is going to ship a fixed doxygen ASAP. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
