On 09/02/15 22:28, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Colin Macdonald wrote:
I'm the new upstream developer of this. Its a rewrite from scratch. If
it helps, I'm happy to (help) maintain the Fedora package---unless of
course we have some policy against that.
Welcome to Fedora! Your help is of course
Colin Macdonald wrote:
I'm the new upstream developer of this. Its a rewrite from scratch. If
it helps, I'm happy to (help) maintain the Fedora package---unless of
course we have some policy against that.
Welcome to Fedora! Your help is of course welcome. There is no policy
against upstream
On 08/02/15 00:00, Thomas Sailer wrote:
octave-symbolic v2.0.0 changes the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+. Are
there any objections? According to repoquery no other package in the
repository depends on octave-symbolic.
I'm the new upstream developer of this. Its a rewrite from scratch. If
it
octave-symbolic v2.0.0 changes the license from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+. Are
there any objections? According to repoquery no other package in the
repository depends on octave-symbolic.
Tom
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
