Hi,
I've submitted my first Fedora package for review and sponsoring recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673175
I want to submit it for Fedora and EPEL 5. The differences between the two are
minimal, there are just some programs missing in EPEL which need to be
commented out
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Gerd v. Egidy li...@egidy.de wrote:
Hi,
I've submitted my first Fedora package for review and sponsoring recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673175
I want to submit it for Fedora and EPEL 5. The differences between the two
are
minimal,
GvE == Gerd v Egidy li...@egidy.de writes:
GvE What is the best way to handle this? Can I keep one spec for both
GvE and use conditionals to always build the right way?
You can. Do keep in mind, however, that the amount of conditional
garbage you have to pile into the spec file can get to be a
Hi Steve,
I want to submit it for Fedora and EPEL 5. The differences between the
two are
minimal, there are just some programs missing in EPEL which need to be
commented out in the default config.
This page
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag
and the buildsys macros RPM on EPEL5
Gerd v. Egidy wrote:
I've seen code like %if 0%{?rhel} somewhere on the net, but that didn't
work for me. I guess the %rhel-macro should be defined in
/etc/rpm/macros.dist where I usually find stuff like %fedora but that
doesn't exist on my Centos 5.
%{rhel} is defined in the EPEL build
On 02/01/2011 09:27 AM, Gerd v. Egidy wrote:
How can I make sure that buildsys-macros is installed?
BuildRequires: buildsys-macros
won't work because there is no buildsys-macros on Fedora. And
You don't need to do that as buildsys-macros is part of the buildroot in
koji for EPEL5.
$ koji
MC == Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com writes:
MC I don't know why, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to have it in the
MC repository like a normal package, IMO.
Not that this will really explain anything, but:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563176
- J
--
devel mailing list
