Re: perl-Net-DNS-SEC license correction
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Petr Šabata wrote: This package's license tag was wrong all along; the license tag will be corrected to `MIT'. Updates are on the way. hm, I had 1.01 packages pending.. Also, the license says GPL+ or Artistic. The README says: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific prior written permission. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. Is that not the artistic license? Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
perl-Net-DNS-SEC license correction
This package's license tag was wrong all along; the license tag will be corrected to `MIT'. Updates are on the way. P pgpiyQZKR8lcF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: perl-Net-DNS-SEC license correction
GPL/Artistic is the perl license; the module's META.json specifies the MIT license. The text included in the module is similar to the MIT and ISC license text, it is definitely not the Artistic license or GPL. Personally I would seek clarification from the author(s). On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote: On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Petr Šabata wrote: This package's license tag was wrong all along; the license tag will be corrected to `MIT'. Updates are on the way. hm, I had 1.01 packages pending.. Also, the license says GPL+ or Artistic. The README says: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific prior written permission. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. Is that not the artistic license? Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: perl-Net-DNS-SEC license correction
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:17:33AM -0400, Dan Book wrote: GPL/Artistic is the perl license; the module's META.json specifies the MIT license. The text included in the module is similar to the MIT and ISC license text, it is definitely not the Artistic license or GPL. Personally I would seek clarification from the author(s). I can ask upstream but giving the extreme similarity and the CPAN metadata (taken from Makefile.PL - META.* files) explicitly states `MIT', it seems rather clear. Petr pgpVGhNlGQaon.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
