I didn't test enabling options separately, but only "Enable automatic
suspend for USB Device $name" looks like it has to do anything with these
issues. I don't this option in tuned.
2017-04-10 23:53 GMT+02:00 Thomas Daede :
> On 04/09/2017 02:39 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
> > I had bad experi
On Apr 10, 2017 7:39 AM, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 04:47:54PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 01.org has several projects related to power management, but most
> aren't in Fedora repositories. Are any of these useful for the recent
> effort to make
On 4/9/17 4:39 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
> I had bad experience with enabling powertop' service - USB mice and
> headphones don't work very well with that. But I am using tuned
> (tuned-gtk) for few years and I didn't notice any issues
> (top-battery) profile. I see that my Haswell laptop is u
On 04/09/2017 02:39 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
> I had bad experience with enabling powertop' service - USB mice and
> headphones don't work very well with that. But I am using tuned (tuned-gtk)
> for few years and I didn't notice any issues (top-battery) profile. I see
> that my Haswell lap
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 04:47:54PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 01.org has several projects related to power management, but most
> aren't in Fedora repositories. Are any of these useful for the recent
> effort to make power management better on Fedora?
If you're packaging thin
I had bad experience with enabling powertop' service - USB mice and headphones
don't work very well with that. But I am using tuned (tuned-gtk) for few years
and I didn't notice any issues (top-battery) profile. I see that my Haswell
laptop is using both C2 and C3 power-saving states.
Maybe thi
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 05:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Powertop, maybe it ought to be a feature request for F27, and see if a
>> bunch of bug reports happen during the beta *shrug*. I've used it on
>> an ancient and new laptop, of different manufacture
On 04/07/2017 05:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Powertop, maybe it ought to be a feature request for F27, and see if a
> bunch of bug reports happen during the beta *shrug*. I've used it on
> an ancient and new laptop, of different manufacture, and haven't had a
> problem. But of course if it puts e.
d profiles every
> time I install a Fedora system. The big thing that has prevented this
> previously, as I understand, is the possibility to expose power
> management bugs, breaking things for some users.
>
> In my experience some of the powertop settings make quite a big
> differen
as I understand, is the possibility to expose power
management bugs, breaking things for some users.
In my experience some of the powertop settings make quite a big
difference. Out of the box on my haswell laptop, Fedora never enters any
package state lower than C2. Just turning on SATA link power
01.org has several projects related to power management, but most
aren't in Fedora repositories. Are any of these useful for the recent
effort to make power management better on Fedora?
I've been compiling thermald from source for a while, and it does make
a difference to battery lif
Forwarding an invite from Jan Scotka:
Hi,
There is planned Power Management testday today. If you are interested to see
capabilities of your machine or measure power consumption please join us, you
will see what your HW know.
Everybody with various HW configuration welcomed (Old & New &
Hi,
There is planned Power Management testday tomorrow. It will be part of
Open House in Brno RH office
If you are interested to see capabilities of your machine or measure
power consumption please come, you will see what your HW know.
Everybody with various HW configuration welcomed (Old &
Hi,
I'm glad to announce Power management testday,
date: 2012-10-11 (Thursday), link: [1]
During this event suspend/hibernate/resume, backlight control
as well as tuned daemon will be tested. You can also measure
& compare power consumption with others. As a new F18 kernel
feature s
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
Confirmed the suspend fix. overheating still happening. Trying out older
kernels now to pinpoint the exact version that introduced this.
I tried the oldest kernels available and they also caused overheating,
so I assume the problem is related to an upda
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Josh Boyer wrote:
Suspend is no longer working for me on 3.3.1-5 or 3.3.2-1 on a Lenovo
ThinkPad x220, but I haven't had any issues with overheating. Then
again, I wasn't doing kernel compiles either.
Update selinux-policy to -116. There's a bug that causes the sync
comm
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
>> running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
>> overheating. I've updated the bugzi
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
overheating. I've updated the bugzilla item to reflect
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.3.0-4 and see if it still happens.
I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> I can no longer reproduce this on 3.3.1-5, so I'm assuming I was indeed
> running an older kernel when kernel compiles shut down my machine for
> overheating. I've updated the bugzilla item to reflect this.
Suspend is no longer working for m
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating
issue
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 08:41:44PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Also, when i close the lid, the suspension icon keeps blinking and the
> laptop does not actualy suspend.
I'm seeing this, luckily I haven't hit your overheating issues :) About to
try 3.3.2-1 to see if this helps.
Christophe
pgptE
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 21:28 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating
> > issue
> >
> > Could be
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6754
On Mon, 16 Apr 2012, Chris Murphy wrote:
Subject: Re: 3.3.1-5.fc17.x86_64.debug power management and overheating issue
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
Actually, it looks like what they did to fix that might have caused it
to happen to me. I'll go back to 3.
Could be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675433
On Apr 16, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else seeing issues with 3.3.1-5.fc17?
>
> My thinkpad X201 both overheats and shuts down:
>
> Apr 16 20:30:19 thinkpad kernel: [ 5508.559650] intel ips :00:
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing issues with 3.3.1-5.fc17?
My thinkpad X201 both overheats and shuts down:
Apr 16 20:30:19 thinkpad kernel: [ 5508.559650] intel ips :00:1f.6: MCP
limit exceeded: Avg temp 9572, limit 9000
Apr 16 20:30:24 thinkpad kernel: [ 5513.556695] intel ips :00:1f.6: MCP
Hi, folks! Just wanted to remind everyone that along with Beta testing,
it's Test Day time again today:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-04_Power_Management
We'll be looking at power management. This is a regular Test Day so it
should go off nice and smoothly, and of cour
ither and I do not
> take Phoronix's reviews very seriously, but I was curious.
If you read Phoronix's articles (not just their headlines), even they
admit that this is not really a 'regression'. It's a perfectly sensible
bug fix. PCIe Active State Power Management was
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 06:35 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was
> really great. Stats follows
>
> thanks & regards
>
> Jaroslav
Big thanks for doing all the organization and publicity for
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> I cannot reproduce these numbers on our testing machine - in [1] power
> consumption in active idle is +- measurement error, in other tests
> it is mostly higher power consumption, but also higher performance.
> Similar for idle graph in [2]. I will try to get one of the
- Original Message -
> Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> > thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback
> > was
> > really great. Stats follows
>
> On the topic of power management:
>
> Is there anything being done to address the regressi
Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was
> really great. Stats follows
On the topic of power management:
Is there anything being done to address the regressions[1] in 2.6.38+
kernels?
[1] http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=a
Hi,
thanks all who attended the Power Management Test day, the feedback was
really great. Stats follows
thanks & regards
Jaroslav
P.S.: If you missed the event you can still post your results at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-29_PowerManagement
---
Power Management Test
Fedora 16 power management test day will start this Thursday (2011-09-29).
The event will be mainly focused on laptops, but even desktop machines can
be tested. Everybody is welcome to attend this event and your attendance
will help us to make the PM in Fedora better. Special LiveCD was prepared
Hi,
thanks all for participation in Power Management Test Day -
we received great response. If you missed the event, you can
still participate (all feedback is very valuable for us):
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24
PM Test Day Stats:
28 unique participants
27 unique
On 03/22/2011 06:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The Fedora 15 Test Day schedule continues to roll, and this week it's
> the turn of power management:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24
I would like to participate but the live CD .iso (linked to in the above
p
The Fedora 15 Test Day schedule continues to roll, and this week it's
the turn of power management:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24
This event will concentrate on testing how well various common power
management operations work on a range of systems, and also on testin
Hi,
I would like to re-introduce the Power Management (PM) SIG meetings.
The PM SIG (http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/PowerManagement)
is a group of Fedora contributors that wants to improve the current state
of power management and savings across the whole Fedora distribution
38 matches
Mail list logo
