Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> There is one release so far this year, qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4, based
> on WebKitGTK 2.12. Security support for 2.12 ended in September 2016.
> So that is the status of your "less outdated" version.
The last Qt 4 WebKit was branched from WebKit master in early August
There is one release so far this year, qtwebkit-5.212.0-alpha4, based
on WebKitGTK 2.12. Security support for 2.12 ended in September 2016.
So that is the status of your "less outdated" version. Applications
will continue to depend on it indefinitely if they have no flag date to
migrate.
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Well that only halfway removes QtWebKit. There is also the Qt5 version
> of the package that needs to be removed as well.
The Qt 5 version is less outdated and there is still hope that it can be
brought up to date (upstream does not look dead:
On 06.11.20 13:00, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Sandro Mani wrote:
But I'll also expand the analysis to the entire qt4 stack and see what
comes out.
Dropping the entire Qt 4 stack is a non-starter. I am keeping the qt4
package secure with backported security fixes. I see no reason to drop
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:36 pm, Sandro Mani
wrote:
On 06.11.20 01:27, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519
Soo, initial change proposal for dropping qtwebkit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Smani/QtwebkitRemoval
Feedback welcome.
Christian Stadelmann wrote:
>> The following packages will be retired:
>> arora
>> […]
>> rekonq
>
> Is there any reasons why they should retired and not also being obsoleted?
> (Just asking, not suggesting. I don't really know the process but what
> happens if someone still has arora installed,
Thank you for this proposal!
I found a small typo:
> fro mother
> The following packages will be retired:
> arora
> […]
> rekonq
Is there any reasons why they should retired and not also being obsoleted?
(Just asking, not suggesting. I don't really know the process but what happens
if
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Soo, this opened a bit a can of worms, as qt-mobility (clearly being of
>> the qt4 era dead upstream) is not going to support proj7.
>
> Can't we get it to build without proj? Does QtWebKit or anything else
> actually need the parts that wrap
Sandro Mani wrote:
> But I'll also expand the analysis to the entire qt4 stack and see what
> comes out.
Dropping the entire Qt 4 stack is a non-starter. I am keeping the qt4
package secure with backported security fixes. I see no reason to drop it.
Qt4WebKit is a different matter, though I
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Soo, this opened a bit a can of worms, as qt-mobility (clearly being of
> the qt4 era dead upstream) is not going to support proj7.
Can't we get it to build without proj? Does QtWebKit or anything else
actually need the parts that wrap proj?
Kevin Kofler
On 06.11.20 01:27, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519
Soo, initial change proposal for dropping qtwebkit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Smani/QtwebkitRemoval
Feedback welcome. I'll also post the link in the bug.
Sandro
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:26:37 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
> >>> shortly. I'll do a round of
On Thursday, 05 November 2020 at 22:26, Sandro Mani wrote:
[...]
> > > On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > > I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
> > > > shortly. I'll do a round of test builds in this copr [1], and
> > > > then build everything (and rebuild
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711519
(And related, but for Qt5:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872819)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 06.11.20 00:16, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:26 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
shortly. I'll do
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 10:26 PM Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
> On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >
> > On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
> >>> shortly. I'll do a round of
On 05.11.20 20:27, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 05.11.20 12:36, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 05/11/2020 11:24, Sandro Mani wrote:
I'll be building proj-7.2.0 together with gdal-3.2.0 in rawhide
shortly. I'll do a round of test builds in this copr [1], and then
build everything (and rebuild dependent
17 matches
Mail list logo
