Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Zoltan Kota wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha > wrote: >> Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone? > > Bibus, pybliographer? There's also KBibTex (which was recently ported from kdelibs 3 to kdelibs 4, the current Fedora 14 and 15 updates have

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-25 Thread Zoltan Kota
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi, > > Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone? Bibus, pybliographer? Zoltan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote: > > My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages > > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they > > can't even install the package. > > > > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm,

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-24 Thread Alex Lancaster
> My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they > can't even install the package. > > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be > added back to Fedora. > > Alex, could you pleas

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-24 Thread Kalev Lember
On 10/21/2011 09:37 PM, Alex Lancaster wrote: > There is a branch that was started back in February to port to gio > and away from libgnomemm: > > http://icculus.org/pipermail/referencer/2011-February/000534.html > > There was a commit to it in August, but looks the mm dep is still there > in the

Re: retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?

2011-10-21 Thread Alex Lancaster
Hi Kalev, (Cc'ed to devel list to see if anybody else has suggestions). As you've noted libgnomeuimm has been obsoleted in f16 and higher, and referencer doesn't look like it's ported to use anything else. I filed a bug in what appears to be a (potentially) active (but slow) upstream to get some