bacula is already in fedora.
why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941
why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/01/12 11:37, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
bacula is already in fedora.
why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941
why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula
