Review swap: 2 GAP packages

With the arrival of GAP 4.13.0 in Rawhide, I find myself in need of 2 more GAP packages (which do some work in C rather than in the GAP language, for speed): - gap-pkg-anupq: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270581 - gap-pkg-fplsa: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856 I

Re: Review swap

Isn't the wasi-sdk just umbrella project? Is it really needed? We have llvm / clang, we have wasi-libc, what else do you need? Vít Dne 06. 03. 24 v 11:08 Jan Horak napsal(a): Hi, if anyone is willing to make a review for wasi-sdk - build require for the Firefox rlbox sandboxing of the used

Review swap

Hi, if anyone is willing to make a review for wasi-sdk - build require for the Firefox rlbox sandboxing of the used c/c++ libraries, please have a look and let me know about your package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267683 -- Jan Horak Senior Software Engineer Red Hat --

Review-swap: trivial golang package to update nats stack

I'd like to offer to swap reviews to get golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237326 into Rawhide We already have v1 and attempting to update that package in order to upgrade the nats stack led to some breakage and headaches a few months ago Thanks all,

Review swap: objfw

Hi! Would someone be willing to review swap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235768 with me? Thanks! -- Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Simple review swap: python-pygments-git

On 8/29/23 13:40, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pygments-git reviewed. They are pygments lexers for git output and files. The review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229721 It should be a simple review, so

Simple review swap: python-pygments-git

Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pygments-git reviewed. They are pygments lexers for git output and files. The review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229721 It should be a simple review, so unofficial reviews from folks looking to

Re: Review swap Bottles dependencies

On 22-04-2023 14:36, Sandro wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies. 1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews

Re: review swap

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 02:40:13PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633 > > Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro > >

Re: review swap

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633 > Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro > packages > The packaging is trivial, there isn't even a %build section. > This

review swap

Hi, I have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189633 Review Request: mkosi-initrd - Generator for initrd images using distro packages The packaging is trivial, there isn't even a %build section. This is for https://github.com/systemd/mkosi-initrd. I'll also submit a Change for F39

Review swap – wasi-libc

Hello, I have a RR opened for wasi-libc, C standard library implementation on top of WebAssembly System Interface. There were already some back and forth discussion on the package, and I feel it is now ready for the formal review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166379 I'm willing

Review swap Bottles dependencies

Hi, I'm looking for a review for a couple of Bottles dependencies. 1. python-fvs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 2. vkbasalt-cli https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188653 Both are Python packages and I'll be happy to do reviews in return, with Python having my

python-orjson Review Swap

Hi everyone, I'm looking for a review swap for python-orjson [1], preferably something in Go or Python. This package is needed by newer versions of bottles and is starting to be used by other Python projects as well. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184237 -- Thanks, Maxwell G

Review swap rust-pythonize

Hello, I'm looking for someone to do a package review of rust-pythonize[1]. I will do a review in return. Kai [1] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

review swap: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats

ocp (Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/MIDI music files) has grown a new dependency on libancient. I submitted a new package review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165381 Review Request: ancient - Modern decompressor for old data compression formats This is a collection

Review Swap: C++ or python

I would now like to add python-xrst to fedora; see the review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159469 python-xrst is a wrapper for the sphinx documentation tool; see https://xrst.readthedocs.io/en/latest/purpose.html I am fluent in C++ and Python and would be willing to swap

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:45:08PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > >> > >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 >> >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. >> >> This package / review bug has been extensively

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > > > > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. > > > > This package / review

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > > I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. > > This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!) > on the review

Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. This package / review bug has been extensively reviewed -- 87 comments(!!) on the review already. We are pretty sure it is in good shape now. As it is a "C library" that is

Re: Review swap

On 12/29/22 22:32, TI_Eugene wrote: > Can review something against my new package - QCustomPlot/PyQt > binding: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156080 > > Qt and/or python packages are preferable, but not exactly. > > ___ Taken

Review swap

Can review something against my new package - QCustomPlot/PyQt binding: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156080 Qt and/or python packages are preferable, but not exactly.___ devel

Review swap

Hi all, I have a perl package (diff-so-fancy) up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150097 I'd be happy to review something in return. -- Arthur Bols fas/irc: principis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Review swap

Hi everyone, Here's an easy one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140316 Happy to review something in exchange. Best, -- Iñaki Úcar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

NeuroFedora review swap: python-formulaic

Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-formulaic reviewed and included in Fedora[1]. It's required to update python-pybids to the latest version[2] It should be a straightforward review. Unofficial reviews from candidate package maintainers looking for review

Review swap for python-tpm2-pytss

Hi all, I am looking forward getting the above package into Fedora, which is now a dependency for a package I already maintain, tpm2-pkcs11. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2135713 Thanks, -- Jakub Jelen Crypto Team, Security Engineering Red Hat, Inc.

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

On 17-10-2022 18:36, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote: Hi, I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies: python-plotnine   python-scikit-misc   python-adjustText   pythn-mizani   python-palettable Could you please share

Re: Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

On 17. 10. 22 15:15, Sandro wrote: Hi, I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies: python-plotnine   python-scikit-misc   python-adjustText   pythn-mizani   python-palettable Could you please share the links? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone:

Review swap for python-plotnine and dependencies

Hi, I have submitted reviews for python-plotnine and its dependencies: python-plotnine python-scikit-misc python-adjustText pythn-mizani python-palettable Some have been sitting around waiting for a while now, so I thought I'd ask if somebody would be willing to

Re: Review swap for pf-bb-config

On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 5:08 PM Timothy Redaelli wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for reviews or review swap for pf-bb-config: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101769 > > The spec file is straightforward, so it should be > trivial to review it. > >

Review swap for pf-bb-config

Hi, I'm looking for reviews or review swap for pf-bb-config: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101769 The spec file is straightforward, so it should be trivial to review it. I'd be happy to review packages in exchange. Thank you, Timothy

GAP 4.12 and a package review swap

The gap package has a new version available (4.12), which comes with significant improvements over 4.11. I've been working on updating the entire gap stack [1] for the new version. The spec files have been simplified and made more uniform, which should aid future maintenance. I need one new

Review swap: a port compiler plugin for Rebar3

Hello All! This spec is actually quite simple - it does all the heavy lifting with generic Erlang macros, builds cleanly, so it won't take you long https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175 I am willing to review something which got stuck in your queue for a while. -- With best

Re: Package review swap: ubdsrv - Userspace block driver server

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote: > Ah I see you got someone. > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:19 PM Jonathan Wright > wrote: > > I'll trade you for a basic Python package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > show_bug.cgi?id=2121258 I've taken this one

Re: Package review swap: ubdsrv - Userspace block driver server

Ah I see you got someone. On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:19 PM Jonathan Wright wrote: > I'll trade you for a basic Python package: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121258 > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > >> >>

Re: Package review swap: ubdsrv - Userspace block driver server

I'll trade you for a basic Python package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121258 On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:56 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2122605 > > Pretty simple package, just a small library and a single tool. > > This

Package review swap: ubdsrv - Userspace block driver server

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2122605 Pretty simple package, just a small library and a single tool. This bug depends on a change to the Rawhide kernel configuration before it will work (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2122595) but I don't think that needs to get in the way

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

to:lyessa...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Hello devel! I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson guidelines. blueprint-compiler : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210

Re: Review swap : blueprint-compiler

I'm happy to trade for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118887 On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 1:03 PM Lyes Saadi wrote: > Hello devel! > > I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting > since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the

Review swap : blueprint-compiler

Hello devel! I have new dependency I need to update dialect to 2.0. It's been waiting since july, so I'm proposing a review swap. It's the python/meson guidelines. blueprint-compiler : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106919 Regards, Lyes Saadi

Review swap

Hi all, I need a name change review, from python-pep621 to python-pyproject-metadata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2111269 I am happy to do a review for you. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Looking for a review swap for an easy review, fuse2fs for epel7

Anybody? Dave On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 02:58:47PM +, Dave Dykstra via devel wrote: > I am looking for someone to review adding fuse2fs to only epel7: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533 > It is already a standard part of e2fsprogs everywhere else. > > Let me know what

Looking for a review swap for an easy review, fuse2fs for epel7

I am looking for someone to review adding fuse2fs to only epel7: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533 It is already a standard part of e2fsprogs everywhere else. Let me know what you would like me to review in return. Dave ___ devel

Re: Anyone want to review swap? (rocm-opencl)

Thanks Luya! I've landed rocm-opencl in rawhide, with epel8/9 and Fedora 36 pending :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Anyone want to review swap? (rocm-opencl)

On 2022-06-28 3:56 p.m., "Jeremy Newton" wrote: I'm looking to see if anyone wants to review swap with me: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 Thanks! I will take it as needed for AMD system. ___ devel mailing lis

Anyone want to review swap? (rocm-opencl)

I'm looking to see if anyone wants to review swap with me: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090823 Thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Review swap: brlaser (CUPS driver for Brother laser printers)

Hi, I would like to get open source Brother drivers into Fedora. Can someone look into this package review? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068909 I'm happy to review something in return. Thanks! :-) Ondřej ___ devel mailing list --

Review swap: mininet

Hi, Here's the request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072115 Happy to review something in exchange. Cheers, -- Iñaki Úcar ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

Em sex., 11 de mar. de 2022 às 18:42, Jerry James escreveu: > > HI Paulo, Hi Jerry, > It's great to hear from you. I hope you are well. Sorry for again taking a bit long to respond :( I have sagemath 9.5 built locally for almost a month, but I will not interfere with your work right now,

Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

HI Paulo, It's great to hear from you. I hope you are well. On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:42 AM Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > If nobody takes it, I can review. Ankur took it already. On the other hand, he doesn't seem to have actually started the review yet... > I was about to ask

Re: Singular soname bump and a review swap

trying to give away so that I can keep claiming that the packages are > in good shape. Is anyone interested in a review swap? I need this > one: > > python-primecountpy: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2061570 > > The updates will be done sometime nex

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: libsonata

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 13:34:26 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:17 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'd like to get libsonata reviewed for inclusion in Fedora as part of > > the NeuroFedora packages. Would anyone have any pending reviews they'd > > like to swap

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: libsonata

On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 1:17 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to get libsonata reviewed for inclusion in Fedora as part of > the NeuroFedora packages. Would anyone have any pending reviews they'd > like to swap please? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061077 I can

NeuroFedora review swap: libsonata

Hi folks, I'd like to get libsonata reviewed for inclusion in Fedora as part of the NeuroFedora packages. Would anyone have any pending reviews they'd like to swap please? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061077 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Singular soname bump and a review swap

. Sagemath 9.5 has spun the primecount interface out into a separate package. This means that I need to *add* one package to the set I am trying to give away so that I can keep claiming that the packages are in good shape. Is anyone interested in a review swap? I need this one: python

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 13:46 -0500, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Your email made me look at this upstream > (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder > if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me of > https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/dockerfile-parse .

Re: Review swap - python-specfile

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:09 AM Nikola Forró wrote: > Hello, > > is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]? Your email made me look at this upstream (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me

Review swap - python-specfile

Hello, is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]? I'd be happy to review a package of similar complexity in return. Thanks, Nikola [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054599 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: One more review swap

Mattia, I'll swap you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758 Dave On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:43:34AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Here I am again asking one more review swap. > > I'm in need to have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043 &

One more review swap

Here I am again asking one more review swap. I'm in need to have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043 reviewed, so I can retire the old libraries packages and update the whole INDI ecosystem. Let me know if someone wants to make a swap. Mattia

Re: Review swap

I can take this Can you take https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2041042 in exchange? Thanks Sandro On 15.01.22 14:25, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Is anyone available for a review swap? I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in the queue, I

Review swap

Is anyone available for a review swap? I've got https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038675 waiting in the queue, I can offer a review in return (possibly not rust-* or golang-* stuff, where I have little or no knowledge about). Thanks Mattia

Review swap: python-colored-traceback

I have proposed a python-colored-traceback package at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033730 Would anyone like to do a review swap? I am anxious to get python-colored-traceback reviewed, because the existing python-pwntools package will require python-colored-traceback

Review swap

Hi, can someone please review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032487 This is basically a merge of votca-{tools,csg,xtp} to make building it easier (no more chain builds) and to allow for more testing. Plus it will package the tutorials as well. I am happy to review a package in

Re: Review swap

On 17.12.21 15:31, Jarek Prokop wrote: Hi, I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350 I'll take

Review swap

Hi, I have a few rubygem packages that need a (re-)review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010263 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010313 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2010350 Thanks, Jarek

Review swap

Hi, Can someone please review these 3 package reviews? They are three Rust crates packages; two of them are re-reviews due to the crates being renamed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007419 (crate renamed, depends on 1983160's

Review Swap sugar-view-slides

Hi Everyone, I currently have a review request open for the sugar-view-slides package, the package was dropped a while back due to an FTB and the package has been fixed and now builds but is still been dropped by rawhide.  Can someone help me review it so it can get added back to rawhide?

spdrs60: package review swap

Hello all, I have a new package request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011964 , which needs to be reviewed. If anyone is interested in a review swap — feel free to take it, and I can review another package in return. Thanks! -- wbr, Denis

Review swap

Help needed for reviewing this trivial python package python-ansible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010045 -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.

Re: Review swap

On 02.10.21 19:40, Jerry James wrote: The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency. I need a review for this simple python package: python-sphinx-sitemap:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987 Who would like to swap reviews? I'll take it. I've currently got up

Review swap

The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency. I need a review for this simple python package: python-sphinx-sitemap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987 Who would like to swap reviews? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Review swap request: python-datalad

Hi folks, The deps are all packaged so datalad is also up for review now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002848 Happy to swap reviews, as always :) It's an awesome tool for use in scientific (and other) work. Here's the handbook for a quick glance:

Review swap for new azure-cli dependency

most of the other python-azure-* SDK components that are already packaged. Would someone be able to do a review swap so I can get azure-cli updated? I'm most familiar reviewing Python, C/C++, and golang, but I can always learn something new.  Thank you! [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla

Re: [NeuroFedora-bugs] Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 09:38:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos > > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest

Re: Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hi folks, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release > (and fix its FTI/FTBFS). > >

Review swap: python-pathos (required to update python-SALib)

Hi folks, Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release (and fix its FTI/FTBFS). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598 It should be a relatively straight forward review. It uses the new

Review swap: pluma-plugins - Modules for the pluma text editor

Hello all, I am looking for a review swap, here is a link to my bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991208 Thank you Wolfgang ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

Hi On 27.07.21 22:50, Major Hayden wrote:   python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981573   python-azure-devtools (for testing the Azure CLI/SDK)   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414   python-azure-mgmt-insights

Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

-azure-mgmt-hybridcompute https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982435 Most of the python-azure* packages are quite standardized using pyproject-rpm-macros. If someone has some spare cycles to look at any of these, I'll be happy to do a review swap with you. Most of my experience is around

Re: Review swap request: python-xds-protos

On 7/23/21 2:35 PM, Ben Beasley wrote: I’d like to get python-xds-protos (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35. This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s ultimately

Review swap request: python-xds-protos

I’d like to get python-xds-protos (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35. This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s ultimately generated from sources inside grpc, but is

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is written in C++ and uses > > CMake as build system. > > > > Happy to do reviews for other packages of similar complexity > > (Python, > > Go, C++, Rust, meson/C). > > > > I'll take the review, though I don't hav

Re: Review swap: fluent-bit

m. > > Happy to do reviews for other packages of similar complexity (Python, > Go, C++, Rust, meson/C). > I'll take the review, though I don't have anything of similar complexity right now to review swap. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

Review swap: fluent-bit

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980723 Fluent Bit is a high performance and multi-platform log forwarder: https://github.com/fluent/fluent-bit. It is written in C++ and uses CMake as build system. Happy to do reviews for other packages of similar complexity (Python, Go, C++, Rust,

Soname bumps and a review swap

Next week, I plan to build the following in Rawhide: - antic 0.2.4 - e-antic 1.0.1 (soname bump) - eclib 20210625 (soname bump) - flint 2.7.1 (soname bump) - normaliz 3.9.0 The following packages will be rebuilt due to the changes above: - arb - polymake - pynac - sagemath - Singular The eclib

Re: Trivial review swap: python-configupdater

On 06/07/2021 21:06, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I've got a trivial Python package that needs to be reviewed. It's a new BR for the new version of python-pyscaffold that's currently FTBFS and is blocking a couple of packages in rawhide. Review here:

Trivial review swap: python-configupdater

Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I've got a trivial Python package that needs to be reviewed. It's a new BR for the new version of python-pyscaffold that's currently FTBFS and is blocking a couple of packages in rawhide. Review here:

golang package review swap

Hello, I've submitted a few packages I need reviewed. I'm happy to swap if anyone has any pending reviews. 1) 1976038 - golang-github-sgreben-flagvar[1] 2) 1976041 - golang-github-peterbourgon-ff-3[2] 3) 1976414 - mqttcli[3] 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976038 2:

NeuroFedora package review swap: python-lfpykit

Hi folks, One of our NeuroFedora packages has added a new dep in its new version, which FTBFS as a result. Would someone like to swap reviews please? 1976640 – Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for multicompartment neuron models

Review swap: git autofixup - very handy git plugin written in Perl

Hello. I've created my first Perl package and I need somebody who can review it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974666 The git-autofixup is very useful plugin for git. I can take a review in exchange - most of my experience is with Python packages. Have a nice day. Lumír

Review swap: rust-clang-ast

Hi all, one of my packages (newsboat) grew yet another rust dependency, and I need that dependency RPM reviewed [1]. [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974377 I'm willing to take a review in exchange, if you need any. Note that I tried to write directly to rust-sig ML, but that

python-connection_pool Review Swap

Hello everyone! I was packaging up some deps for a tool which would be useful in NeuroFedora [0]. A package review for python-connection_pool is still pending to proceed further, and I would be happy to swap them with other developers here :D Review:

review swap: plocate

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 I'd be happy to do some reviews in return. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Python Review Swap --- NeuroFedora Packages

Hello all! I was packaging up some deps for a few packages which would be essential to NeuroFedora [0]. There are some reviews pending to proceed further, and would be happy to swap them with other developers here :D Review 1 - Python-PuLP: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958914

Review swap: guestfs-tools

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942114 This is actually a split of an existing package. The existing package (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs) is huge and unwieldy and upstream we've split off the tools part from the library part. So I want to make the same change

Review swap: hugo container image

Hi, I am packaging a container image and I would love to get a review on it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1930236 I can review either a container image or an RPM package back for you :) regards, Athos ___ devel mailing list --

Review swap

Hi all, Recent versions of jmol have a new dependency, jni-inchi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929958 Who would like to swap reviews? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >