On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:20:45 +, Richard wrote:
> > That means you don't have the key installed:
>
> This is a fresh F13 pre-alpha spin, updated last a few days ago.
>
> > $ rpm -Kv sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
> > sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm:
> > Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID 57bbc
On 8 March 2010 10:59, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> That means you don't have the key installed:
This is a fresh F13 pre-alpha spin, updated last a few days ago.
> $ rpm -Kv sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
> sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm:
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID 57bbccba
> Header S
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:42:00 +, Richard wrote:
> The latest sos update is not signed:
>
> [hugh...@hughsie-t61 packages]$ rpm -qp sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
> warning: sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
> key ID 57bbccba: NOKEY
That means you don't have the key installe
The latest sos update is not signed:
[hugh...@hughsie-t61 packages]$ rpm -qp sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
warning: sos-1.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
key ID 57bbccba: NOKEY
This causes PackageKit to barf. How come this update was pushed
without a signature and all the other a
