Kevin Kofler wrote:
>I am user C. I don't need a log of blocked stuff, I'd only be worried
>about intruders DoSing the machine by filling the log. I really want
>ANY outside access to my machine silently dropped. My machine is NOT a
>server, period.
So you never use Bittorrent to download a new Fe
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I doubt that User C *as described* exists. I suspect you meant "User C
> does not want an interactive notification. They want things to be
> blocked and logged appropriately, so that if things are not behaving as
> expected, they can find out why and what they would need
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 23:24 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > User A wants to be notified of all programs opening ports even if he is
> > going to whitelist them.
> > User B does not want to be notified and could care less about security.
> > etc.
>
> User C does not
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> User A wants to be notified of all programs opening ports even if he is
> going to whitelist them.
> User B does not want to be notified and could care less about security.
> etc.
User C does not want to be notified either, but just wants everything
blocked silently.
On 21 December 2014 at 09:45, Björn Persson wrote:
> Mattia Verga wrote:
> >Since I'm not good to write complex sentences in English, here is a
> >schema that explains how I think firewalld should work as I wrote in
> >the previous post.
>
> A "trusted app" to me would mean that I trust that it's
Mattia Verga wrote:
>Since I'm not good to write complex sentences in English, here is a
>schema that explains how I think firewalld should work as I wrote in
>the previous post.
A "trusted app" to me would mean that I trust that it's secure enough
to communicate even on *untrusted* networks. I d
